Peyton Manning sits on trainers face????

#126
#126
Orangedogsrule said:
Yes, he did. She sued when his defamitory lies cost her a job and career. Rollo admitted to the court he made up the mooning someone else lie, the track athlete who he supposedly mooned told the truth in a letter. She literally had to use her hands and twist her head to get him away. The judges ruling from the bench is available.
Click to expand...

The judge said there was enough evidence for a trial because of his comments about her having a "vulgar mouth". The judge made no ruling whatsoever on the defamation suit. Manning settled to avoid the publicity as most high profile businesses and individuals do. You are going off her statement that he sat on her face smearing his sack on her face in a locker room. She has been paid twice for this and tried to sue a third time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#129
#129
Orangedogsrule said:
"Bumper" had a continuing education and an attempt to try to salvage a career as a top Div1 trainer. She had to eventually move on.

If you care about truth, get the trial transcript and the judges bench ruling.

If you don't care about truth, just keep sheepleing around the same old lies.

I'm done on this thread.
Those interested in truth will find it and post it here. It will be exactly as I have described it.
Click to expand...

So you're going away? :clapping: Probably inflict revenge sex on your poor eunuch hubby? :yuck: Finish the night by urinating standing up? :w00t:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#131
#131
Googled Jamie Ann Naughright and I'm kinda disappointed Peyton couldn't find a better looking chick to use as a testicle pedestal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#132
#132
Orangedogsrule said:
You must be afraid to find the truth given under sworn testimony before a judge who ruled against Manning? Sad. Go on believing in yer demi-god.
Click to expand...

Yeah, cause nobody's ever lied under sworn testimony and judges have never ruled incorrectly.

You call people ignorant, and you may be right about what happened, but assuming it's right because it's what court proceedings substantiate makes you the ignorant one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#133
#133
Given the fact that the accounts of the two principal parties in this incident are almost entirely at odds with each other, I will not privilege one over the other. I will say, however, that incidents of this type could be easily avoided if female athletic trainers were prohibited from entering men's locker rooms when athletes are nude, just as I presume that male athletic trainers are still prohibited from entering the locker rooms of female athletes when the latter are nude. The privacy of female athletes/trainers is no more and no less important than those of their male counterparts. Eliminate the double standard.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#134
#134
Volosaurus rex said:
Given the fact that the accounts of the two principal parties in this incident are almost entirely at odds with each other, I will not privilege one over the other. I will say, however, that incidents of this type could be easily avoided if female athletic trainers were prohibited from entering men's locker rooms when athletes are nude, just as I presume that male athletic trainers are still prohibited from entering the locker rooms of female athletes when the latter are nude. The privacy of female athletes/trainers is no more and no less important than those of their male counterparts. Eliminate the double standard.
Click to expand...

From both versions, the only one disrobing was Peyton. It was the training room, not the locker room. His mistake, his bad all the way. The stories only differ in severity.

If today's tech had existed in 96, and someone had posted video of this from their iPhone, the mid-90s Vols might not have been as successful, and its likely there would not have been a street named for the man on campus.

Instead of PM being light in the hip $100k, the University might have paid a settlement with a couple more zeros. They, and we, are fortunate it turned out the way it did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#135
#135
n_huffhines said:
Yeah, cause nobody's ever lied under sworn testimony and judges have never ruled incorrectly.

You call people ignorant, and you may be right about what happened, but assuming it's right because it's what court proceedings substantiate makes you the ignorant one.
Click to expand...

The truth as to the severity probably lies in the middle, and it is important to note the Court did not reach the merits.

People lie under oath all the time, and it is a roll of the dice as to whom the jury would believe (a factor her lawyers undoubtedly considered before filing suit in Florida, a favorable anti-Peyton jury pool). The Court's ruling at that stage means you are pretty much on the cusp of trial. With that uncertainty, it was a no-brainer for him to settle for $100k. It was a cheap price to remove that risk to his long term contract negotiations coming off his rookie deal.

Bottom line, the payoff was .2% of his $35MM signing bonus in 2004. This does not even account for his endorsement comp, which outweighed this at the time.

For perspective, if you make $50k per year in salary, this is like making a $143 payment to make a livelihood-threatening mistake go away.

Who among us would not have paid that as fast as possible?

This was also three years into his marriage. I'd bet that the value of Ashley's apology present approached (and probably exceeded, because PM is a smart fella) the amount of this settlement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#136
#136
This is why social media shouldn't be trusted. Peyton was accused by this chick of mooning her. Now the story is he "sat on her face". What a load of horse***t. Basically Peyton was joking around with her (inappropriately) and she didn't think it was funny. Or she is just a money grubbing whore who saw dollar signs. Either way he paid the price for it and apologized. Years ago.
 
#139
#139
She was known as Jamie Whited at the time of the alleged incident. Don't know why but I got the chuckles with that.
 
#143
#143
Manufactures underarm deodorant...out of her own stank.
 
#146
#146
BowlBrother85 said:
The article here seems to have borrowed heavily from the USA Today story that ran in Nov 2003 (Google Jamie Whited if you are interested) except that it printed the entire letter from the track athlete, Malcolm Saxon. He doesn't give an account of what happened in the letter but does give ominous suggestions such as,"Your celebrity doesn't mean you can treat folks that way. Do the right thing here."...Mike Rollo didn't witness what happened but does say that he was the first to use the word "mooning" to describe the incident. Her lawyer claims that she reported the incident to a Sexual Abuse clinic but that is just her word - nothing more or less. Why didn't she call the police if she felt she had been sexually assaulted? That question is never answered. The USA Today article also notes that they couldn't find another athlete to corroborate Manning's statement in his book that Whited had a vulgar mouth. It certainly doesn't shed Manning (as a then 19 year old) in a positive light...but it leaves out pertinent information as well. She definitely did see this as an opportunity to cash in but continued to work as a trainer at UT until she was able to do so.
Click to expand...


Thank you. People would rather have a soap opera/national enquirer. Peyton didn't sit on her face. That has probably never happened to a trainer in a locker room and people want to act like Peyton would. He mooned her on purpose, not by accident. She probably saw some package too. And she did have the mouth of a vulgar locker room girl. One you would expect to hang with guys. Then she can't take a mooning and knew Peyton was already rich and soon to be richer. She cashed out more than she would've made in her lifetime because of it.
Ridiculous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#147
#147
Pepe_Silvia said:
Googled Jamie Ann Naughright and I'm kinda disappointed Peyton couldn't find a better looking chick to use as a testicle pedestal.
Click to expand...

As did I, but for different reasons. There is another unrelated lawsuit which was thrown out recently accusing a dr and his wife of fraud and other innappropriate activities. Were the accusations true? Does this lady have a habit of surrounding herself with questionable people or making poor personal decisions? Who knows, but I don't know many people who have sued multiple people looking for payouts. As I was taught growing up, if something walks and talks like a duck, guess what it probably is.

The truth is none of us saw what happened years ago thus all of this is speculation. I'd venture a guess that those of us who grew up in the days before social media are all very thankful. Sure will be fun for every person running for public office in 10-20 years time to have all their past mistakes brought into the public eye. No thanks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#149
#149
Ulysees E. McGill said:
This is why social media shouldn't be trusted. Peyton was accused by this chick of mooning her. Now the story is he "sat on her face". What a load of horse***t. Basically Peyton was joking around with her (inappropriately) and she didn't think it was funny. Or she is just a money grubbing whore who saw dollar signs. Either way he paid the price for it and apologized. Years ago.
Click to expand...

Wrong
 
#150
#150
This os a perfect example of telling ten people the same story and getting it passed,, embellished, and a lie ensues. He never sat on a female face as has been stated by OP. Mooned in a male locker room and a female saw $$$$ which she grabbed....truth in history
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top