SayUWantAreVOLution
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2019
- Messages
- 8,440
- Likes
- 10,528
That sounds more like socialism than a business.That and they still have scholarships, while others who practice and play don’t.
Somebody with an NIL deal should pay their own bills.
You want this thing to run like a business, fine. Pay your own way and give the schollies to those who need them.
Rant over.
1) Ain’t a thing in the Constitution about NIL.So you like communism? You want the distribution of wealth amongst players who have less drawing power to be paid the same just because it's fair in your eyes? You believe in taking away people's ability to earn money on their NIL which is constitutionally allowed for all Americans. That sucks for you.
Most of you are just selfish "Preserve the game" who gives a damn if trample on someone's same rights that you would not give up.
If it makes you more comfortable, the athletes have a "side hustle" then. Signing autographs, merchandise, making appearances, whatever.Sure! I get insurance, retirement, 401k… but I pay into it.
My wages pay my mortgage, my truck payment, my food, clothing, etc.
In athlete terms, that means (or should mean) “tuition, room and board, meal plan”
No, I love athletes. I used to be one. But I know how hard it is to put in the time and effort for all that’s involved and then having to foot the bill for everything. I didn’t mind, because NIL wasn’t a thing at the time and I didn’t mind playing for free just because I loved playing.If it makes you more comfortable, the athletes have a "side hustle" then. Signing autographs, merchandise, making appearances, whatever.
Feel better? They're working, like many scholarship students do, for extra money.
Do you think ANY student with a scholarship who also makes other money should get their scholarship pulled? Or do you just hate athletes?
So you should understand. HAD NIL been a thing, you'd have appreciated the money if it were offered and if you played for decent D1 school like UT you surely had an idea that some guys were maybe getting a little something for their efforts.No, I love athletes. I used to be one. But I know how hard it is to put in the time and effort for all that’s involved and then having to foot the bill for everything. I didn’t mind, because NIL wasn’t a thing at the time and I didn’t mind playing for free just because I loved playing.
Perhaps that’s the reason for some tension and issues in the locker room. Maybe that’s why so many are hitting the portal. Some flavor of the month guy comes in making 6 figures on their “side hustle” and others are trying to scrounge income as best they can, all the while working just as hard and being just as big a part of the team as the 6 figure guy.
It’s not healthy. Neither is the portal.
But it’s reality and I guess a sign of the times
I probably would have taken it.So you should understand. HAD NIL been a thing, you'd have appreciated the money if it were offered and if you played for decent D1 school like UT you surely had an idea that some guys were maybe getting a little something for their efforts.
This isn't a new thing. Do you think EVERY Auburn player got what Cam got? Doubtful. This idea that it kills the locker room didn't happen during the "envelope handshake" days when usually only a very few got paid.
NIL restrictions were about to declared illegal by the courts so the NCAA stopped almost all restrictions to avoid losing in court again.
The portal developed because schools were poaching guys or illegally contacting guys and the portal helps (a little) in policing that.
The wide open transfer rules, I'm assuming and I'll listen to other reasons if they're out there, are an attempt by the NCAA to be more "player friendly." I think the NCAA knows it's on its last leg and is dreading the next big lawsuit.
I'm not saying any of this is good. My beef is really with people blaming the athletes. They don't make the rules. They didn't create this mess.
Like you, they want to play ball and here's these opportunities in front of them, legal offers of money, and they'd be dumb not to take them. I don't blame them and I doubt you do...... if you'd been offered NIL, surely you'd have taken it.
Shouldn’t be able to double dip. If they have rules about drawing disability and working full time, then they can have rule about this.That and they still have scholarships, while others who practice and play don’t.
Somebody with an NIL deal should pay their own bills.
You want this thing to run like a business, fine. Pay your own way and give the schollies to those who need them.
Rant over.
Shouldn’t be able to double dip. If they have rules about drawing disability and working full time, then they can have rule about this.
For instance, If you are in the military and get medically retired out, you will get a disability rating from the D.O.D first. Then once you do your VA assessments and exams you will receive another rating from them. At this point you go with the highest % of the two. They won’t let you draw a check from both the D.O.D and the Veterans Affairs for the same injuries. So if they can regulate that, they can regulate NIL and schooling for getting paid/benefits from both places for 1 service. Issues is they are scared to regulate NIL with all the lawsuits they already face surrounding NIL.
Yes damn I hate that these kids can finally provide for themselves and their families life changing wealth if they use their money properly. Only thing worst than this would be if universities offered education on how to maximize the advantages of these payouts. Damn what a terrible idea on cutting in the players on the billions generated by college football.Negotiated a deal… God I hate what college football has become now
there’s needs to be regulation on NIL, that’s what we all can agree on. But what that looks likes, no one knows and the NCAA is scared to even try.How is it double dipping if income is earned from two different sources?
Why should the starting left tackle on scholarship be denied a NIL deal with the local pizza and wings restaurant?