K-town Vol Fan
Blood Runneth Orange
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2005
- Messages
- 19,288
- Likes
- 27,454
The father of my son in law, is a trooper for Missouri. He works the drug task force and is a "trainer" when a new hire comes in from the academy. He is pessimistic about the types of people joining the team. He also said fortunately many of those wash out eventually but not all.I believe too many are bullies and believe themselves above us regular citizens. Also their role as revenue collectors has been expanded way too much
There was an article (maybe on here) about a traffic stop that went bad that also listed the number of violent crime cases that had been closed/solved in that same town. They were all in the 20-30% range yet we still have officers out busting people for a taillight.
I've said it plenty of times, the starting salary of police officers does not attract quality applicants. Who wants to risk their life every day and deal with meth heads for $15/hr?The father of my son in law, is a trooper for Missouri. He works the drug task force and is a "trainer" when a new hire comes in from the academy. He is pessimistic about the types of people joining the team. He also said fortunately many of those wash out eventually but not all.
Your reading comprehension is lacking. The very comment "a few bad apples" clearly shows that he's not talking about all, but a few.I never said anything of the sort. Your post implied that “a few bad apples” in the police was a knuckledragger’s excuse for this behavior. I read into it that you think that all cops are like this.
I don't know if that's where LEOs generally start for salary. But I agree with your premise. The profession seems to attract a lot of former military. I don't know if that is such a good thing either.I've said it plenty of times, the starting salary of police officers does not attract quality applicants. Who wants to risk their life every day and deal with meth heads for $15/hr?
This is the very point I've observed, also. People are rallying behind their "teams". I'm on the pro-cop/Blue Live Matter team, so anything cops do is OK. Or, I'm on the BLM/ACAB side, so all of these killing of blacks by cops is wrong, but we will ignore black on black crime and cops killing white folks.You know, I've noticed a very unsurprising trend here.
The ACAB/F12 folks don't give 2 squats about Tony Timpa, Daniel Shaver and this woman, to just name a few. I wonder why.
Some of the "Floyd shouldn't have been resisting" folks aren't saying the same about this woman. I wonder why.
The media has done a spectacular job at balkanizing us, I'll give them that.
These two things aren't mutually exclusive. There are several violent crimes solved with simple traffic stops.I believe too many are bullies and believe themselves above us regular citizens. Also their role as revenue collectors has been expanded way too much
There was an article (maybe on here) about a traffic stop that went bad that also listed the number of violent crime cases that had been closed/solved in that same town. They were all in the 20-30% range yet we still have officers out busting people for a taillight.
I don't think shoplifting in this case is a "bad law", it's simply the specific officers were stupid and/or ill-trained in how they handled this callThis is the very point I've observed, also. People are rallying behind their "teams". I'm on the pro-cop/Blue Live Matter team, so anything cops do is OK. Or, I'm on the BLM/ACAB side, so all of these killing of blacks by cops is wrong, but we will ignore black on black crime and cops killing white folks.
I'm just standing here in the middle saying that we do have a policing problem that is affecting ALL of us and we also need to remember that the cure is sometimes in the prevention, meaning people need to limit their number of interactions with cops by not engaging in a lot of these criminal acts... even though I agree that a majority of these laws are bogus as hell.
The overall theme is we have bad cops enforcing bad laws.
The father of my son in law, is a trooper for Missouri. He works the drug task force and is a "trainer" when a new hire comes in from the academy. He is pessimistic about the types of people joining the team. He also said fortunately many of those wash out eventually but not all.
These were listed out as % of rapes, murders, armed robbery, etc. The point is revenue collection often takes precedence over crime solvingThese two things aren't mutually exclusive. There are several violent crimes solved with simple traffic stops.
And there are other factors depending on what is considered a "violent crime" For example domestic assault is a violent crime that police usually can arrest the suspect(s) roughly 85-90% of the time, however the cases are never "solved" or "closed to court" because the other party drops the case, not enough evidence or the D.A. doesn't want to deal with it, etc. Same for regular assault.
Other crimes like vehicle burglary or thefts are almost impossible to solve without evidence, and requires officers to conduct regular patrols of high-crime areas to attempt to dissuade the crime as best as possible
I don't know if that's where LEOs generally start for salary. But I agree with your premise. The profession seems to attract a lot of former military. I don't know if that is such a good thing either.
Not true, you need to look at WHY rapes, murders and such are not closed out. It has to do with things like witnesses not wanting to cooperate, no physical evidence, no eyewitnesses, the communities protecting gang bangers out of fear or money, defense attorneys attempting to get every case dismissed due to "mental illness or racism", D.A's making cases go away for political reasons, to get a plea deal for something else, etc. No federal money to assist with evidence processing.These were listed out as % of rapes, murders, armed robbery, etc. The point is revenue collection often takes precedence over crime solving
It's not simplistic at all if you view the role of the police to solve crimes rather than to make up for a county budget shortfall.Not true, you need to look at WHY rapes, murders and such are not closed out. It has to do with things like witnesses not wanting to cooperate, no physical evidence, no eyewitnesses, the communities protecting gang bangers out of fear or money, defense attorneys attempting to get every case dismissed due to "mental illness or racism", D.A's making cases go away for political reasons, to get a plea deal for something else, etc. No federal money to assist with evidence processing.
It's very simplistic to say "police are just writing speeding tickets" and not caring about murders, etc.