- Joined
- Feb 2, 2005
- Messages
- 92,776
- Likes
- 63,082
When they attacked him he wasn't targeting anyone. Had lefty been so scared he should have pulled his illegal firearm earlier. They both took a chance and paid dearly. Oops. Had they let him run past there would have only been one person shot that nightI've referenced Wisconsin self-defense laws, they actually aren't that narrow, just relatively specific as most self-defense laws are, and they did have a clue what happened as more than just those two people were chasing him and yelling about him shooting someone, not to mention the report of five 5.56 shots being discharged inside a hundred yards.
I find it interesting, that you seem to be willing to go to bat for Rittenhouse, and believe without question that he thought he was defending his life in shooting Rosenbaum in an act of clear cut self-defense, even though he was unarmed, didn't fire the shot that Rittenhouse heard, and didn't even connect with the laughably thrown plastic bag, but can't fathom that Grosskreutz and Huber could have believed that they were acting in defense of those around them by trying to disarm Rittenhouse, who'd just shot someone 5 times.
Some of you guys seem to be completely incapable of even trying to look at this scenario from even a minimal position of objectivity.
I also find it humorous you believe any of them could look at his rifle and match the sound from minutes earlier. These people are idiots