Poll: Do you support "Packing the SCOTUS" once ACB is confirmed?

[1972 Grad]

Early voting in Tennessee opens up tomorrow (14th) I'm really curious to see how many are lined up to vote.

I won't be there in line. I always wait until it clears out some.

 

[bpalmer28]

Watching this hearing... ACB is legit and seems as unbiased as imaginably possible.

 

[luthervol]

I won't be there in line. I always wait until it clears out some.

That's why we left yesterday. I heard stories of people waiting more than 8 hours in Cobb County. There can't be that many people who could vote at no other time.

 

[RockyTop85]

So as long as the court is packed in the democrats favor it's okay, but let it possibly drift to the right then tear down the house? Why don't you just move to Europe and have the full Monty experience of living in a liberal utopia?

How is a 5-4 or 6-5 conservative majority “in the democrats favor?”

 

[1972 Grad]

That's why we left yesterday. I heard stories of people waiting more than 8 hours in Cobb County. There can't be that many people who could vote at no other time.

It will probably thin out around here in 10 days to 2 weeks. If it doesn't, I will vote on election day, because there won't be that many people left who haven't already voted..

 

[C-south]

Then why didn't they just vote?

Do you wash your car in the pouring rain?

 

[hog88]

Maybe they will learn from the error of their ways.

LOL....Who am I kidding.

Or maybe the Dems will stop acting like petulant children....... LOL who am I kidding?

 

[1972 Grad]

Or maybe the Dems will stop acting like petulant children....... LOL who am I kidding?

You're funny.

 

[luthervol]

Early voting in Tennessee opens up tomorrow (14th) I'm really curious to see how many are lined up to vote.

I found it interesting also. Where the longest lines were located is also interesting.

 

[luthervol]

Do you wash your car in the pouring rain?

I put mayo on my hamburger.

 

[CagleMtnVol]

Well, your denigration of anyone not labeling themselves "conservative" aside, after the current appointment, the court will slant 6-3... not acceptable.

Like I said after 50 years of being slanted liberal it's time.

 

[C-south]

Well, your denigration of anyone not labeling themselves "conservative" aside, after the current appointment, the court will slant 6-3... not acceptable.

There is no slant if they’re interpreting law and the constitution how it is written. Activism has no place in any court.

 

[NEO]

The problem is that once you start doing it , you can’t stop it , there’s no rules on how many there should be so it just turns into a free for all for how ever has the majority . We don’t want to argue against precedence do we ? I mean that really all abortion is standing on now .

They pack the courts and then send a bill through to limit at 13 after they have added enough jusges to keep it liberal forever.


That is how I would play the game and sadly the dems play for keeps too.

 

[hog88]

They pack the courts and then send a bill through to limit at 13 after they have added enough jusges to keep it liberal forever.


That is how I would play the game and sadly the dems play for keeps too.

Then the Rs repeal the bill and add 4 justices. It will be a never ending cycle once it starts.

 

[hog88]

Who says that if the Dems expand the court the Rs can’t retract it the next time they are in power?

 

[1972 Grad]

I put mayo on my hamburger.

That is your prerogative, but that sounds worse than catsup on steak to me.

 

[newyorkvol]

Who says that if the Dems expand the court the Rs can’t retract it the next time they are in power?

That’s funny. Hadn’t thought of that one. So 4,8,12 years or whenever from now, they go from 13 back to 9 and just “unappoint” the ones they don’t like.

 

[hog88]

That’s funny. Hadn’t thought of that one. So 4,8,12 years or whenever from now, they go from 13 back to 9 and just “unappoint” the ones they don’t like.

I don't see why they couldn't.

 

[luthervol]

Who says that if the Dems expand the court the Rs can’t retract it the next time they are in power?

No one. The clear and obvious answer is that the repubs should wait.

 

[hog88]

No one. The clear and obvious answer is that the repubs should wait.

No the clear and obvious answer is for the public to not vote for children and send the dems packing.

 

[luthervol]

There is no slant if they’re interpreting law and the constitution how it is written. Activism has no place in any court.

Then what's the hurry? Why not wait as they insisted in 2016?

 

[VolStrom]

That is your prerogative, but that sounds worse than catsup on steak to me.

*ketchup

 

[C-south]

Then what's the hurry? Why not wait as they insisted in 2016?

An idiot made one meaningful comment in 8 years. “Elections have consequences”

 

[AM64]

Shocking that a liberal thinks the court will be tilted too far away from their ideology regardless of the fact that constitutionalists are considered right leaning . Smh

Libs just want more flexibility, and they think they've got the election in the bag to give it to them. The constitution is just so restrictive and confining - like the concept of free speech was great until they weaponized it and then the other side decided to play the game as well. Libs are good at diddling with definitions and setting into motion the "what goes around" part, but they need flexibility to minimize the "what comes around" part.

 

[1972 Grad]

*ketchup

I started to do the ketchup thing, but decided to go with the catsup spelling instead.