Good G*d. Just go away. You agree with points while ignoring points, and then decide we need to repeat them for the 20th time.
***********************
You asked about losing a position group. Happened last year and it was a benefit. No reason to panic.
Yah. I know. But that was different.
How?
..... Crickets .....
But what about Nico thinking about leaving?
He's staying.
But he thought about leaving b/c of WR room concerns.
(You know that as fact?) But nonetheless... He's staying. Does your logic mean that there is no more reason for concern about the WR room?
... Crickets ...
But the media!
Appeals to authority aren't support for the validity of the argument.
Yah... Well you still haven't given logical reasons not to panick.
Geez, man. I've wasted enough time on you. Sorry.
************************
I'll end with this. Again, you do you.
Bye.
You want me to go away when you are the one that called out my valid question as illogical handwringing and a “crazy, short-sighted take.” Ok.
The DB situation last year actually left some meat on the bone. We are now down to 2 returning WR and 3 incoming freshmen. Just because that worked last year for DB’s, doesn’t make my question about this year’s WR situation illogical.
I am thrilled Nico seemed satisfied enough to stay. That is not the point. The fact that it has been reported by reputable sources that he and his family were concerned enough about the OL and WR positions to even meet with Huepel and co lends validity to my OG question. It has also been reported that this meeting contributed to Matthews entering the portal.
You are really just trying to sound smart and get the last word in with the “appeals to authority…” bit, while overthinking the whole thing in the process. It’s not that deep. The point there is that a guy like Swain (who has more football knowledge than you and I and a hundred other posters on this board combined) is questioning the WR situation, and that lends validity to my OG question. Ramon Foster said NFL ppl are also questioning him about our WR development, also supporting the validity of my OG question.
Not sure what points I have ignored. But I do agree with certain points because I believe in Huepel and hope he does what it takes to fix the WR room. However, there are logical concerns. I think the whole situation has put Huepel in a tough spot, and I do not envy him.
I thought I had been pretty clear all along, but maybe not. Should you still feel that my original question was illogical handwringing, I hope the summary above helps. However, I imagine you might still attempt to rebut with anecdotal evidence about the movie Twister and word salad like “appeals to authority,” etc.
Anyhow, nice talking to you.