Ah I see. Well yeah probably less likely with ND. Especially since their coach is a relatable and good guy. Now PSU and Franklin on the other handâŚI think people misunderstood my comment. Most of Notre Dame and Penn State's best players will either graduate or be starters next season. Those players can't/won't hit the portal. The players who will hit the portal are those seeking playing time, and from those (looking at their rosters), I don't really see anyone of note. Texas and OSU have better reserves who might decide to transfer, on their rosters. Hopefully I'm wrong about ND and PSU though, because we can use a couple more quality players.
Interesting. I havenât watched them much. But the few times I did I heard his name making plays. Although, their defense does seem to have turned it up towards the end of the season.Christian Gray got picked on every game i watched. It was tough to watch. I am glad he got the interception to set up the game winner.
Itâs because our fans are miserable lunatics.Thank you. I appreciate you commenting on the post. Actually hearing you confirming that you still believe it will happen makes me feel better about our situation. Just all the negatives on here and people asking why we are stuck on this was the reason for the post. But again, it's much appreciated.
Better statistic would be drop to target ratio opposed to just most drops.I also found it interesting that guys like Ryan Williams(7 drops), Tre Harris(5 drops in 8 games), and Kyren Lacy(6 drops) were on that list. Also, Juice Wells had as many drops as Chris Brazzell(6), who was our only guy on the list.
Why do posters keep asking for a âsplashâ WR like theyâre building a roster in the PS5? We have MM.So is it safe to assume it would be from a team in the playoffs? Donât think there are any splash WRs left that were already in the portal
It says how many targets they got but the article is just most drops, not highest drop percentage.Those stats are on the link I posted.
They don't want Bru to come back for fear of him taking targets from MM and the other young receivers. Bringing in a WR they think is great and having him take targets away from MM and the other young receivers is encouraged, though.Why do posters keep asking for a âsplashâ WR like theyâre building a roster in the PS5? We have MM.
Where are all these offensive snaps going to come from?
I don't think MM can do it all!! The more weapons we have the better!! And I'm pretty sure the WRs we have are not gonna complain if we do add someone or if Bru comes back. Just takes pressure off of them and makes their job that much easier, imo.Why do posters keep asking for a âsplashâ WR like theyâre building a roster in the PS5? We have MM.
Where are all these offensive snaps going to come from?
Good info!Looks like that's what they're judging.
View attachment 713664
View attachment 713665
View attachment 713666
Know this won't be popular, but that's never stopped me. No offense to Bru, but I'd rather see our youngsters. Bru is kind of a cross between a TE and WR. Possession guy who blocks well. We need playmakers. Guys who can put a defense on their heels. Bru won't worry any secondary. I'd rather turn the page. Time to move on.Between VQ and our insiders, seems like we've been told we're looking for at least 4 more guys. Maybe that's down to 3 if Bru comes back. But we've been told a RB, WR, OG, and DT. Other than Prego at OG, I have no idea who we're seriously looking at. I hate waiting.
Well, to be honest, even drops per target is a bit deceiving. For instance, if a receiver is targeted 20 times, only drops 1, but has 12 of the other 19 thrown 5 yards over his head, his drop rate would be 5% while he actually dropped 1 out of 8 catchable passes. It may be more accurate to take the number of drops and compare it to the number of catches the receiver had. An example would be Chris Brazzell. He caught 29 passes and dropped 6, so that would mean he had an 82.8% catch rate on catchable balls thrown to him(29 of 35).It says how many targets they got but the article is just most drops, not highest drop percentage.
For instance if someone dropped 3 passes but only got 15 targets (20% drop rate) they donât show up on this list, and that would be much different than someone who dropped 5 but had 75 targets (~7% drop rate).
âStatsâ can be misleading.
Good stuff.Well, to be honest, even drops per target is a bit deceiving. For instance, if a receiver is targeted 20 times, only drops 1, but has 12 of the other 19 thrown 5 yards over his head, his drop rate would be 5% while he actually dropped 1 out of 8 catchable passes. It may be more accurate to take the number of drops and compare it to the number of catches the receiver had. An example would be Chris Brazzell. He caught 29 passes and dropped 6, so that would mean he had an 82.8% catch rate on catchable balls thrown to him(29 of 35).
Itâs just most drops. They threw the targets in for perspective. Lazy statistical work if you ask me. Should have just started with the ratio. But the list would probably be full of backups and no one would care to read the little excerpts (which I didnât read anyways).Looks like that's what they're judging.
View attachment 713664
View attachment 713665
View attachment 713666
Iâve said this already. Take away the meh games.
Use only SEC games, Lewis is below 4ypc.
Wright against SEC teams wouldâve been over 5ypc.
@PlanetVolunteer made some good points earlier though. So Iâm fine, just wanted to point this out.