NighthawkVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2007
- Messages
- 13,281
- Likes
- 47,040
If they get no portal wide receivers, I’m fine with that. If they do, I’m fine with that too.To be fair, I think we’re all a little stumped by the “no portal WR”
What people fail to grasp about the portal is that sometimes if you bring one in, it pushes another out. So you’ve made up no ground, may lose ground, and possibly increased your NIL expenditures, depending on what you had to pay for the portal guy.
These behind the scenes dynamics are things that we as fans don’t have a grasp of. Will a young WR leave if a portal guy comes in? Would we lose a RB if we bring another from the portal?
But the coaching staff has an understanding of these dynamics. And that’s why it’s ridiculous to say that if we get no portal wide WRs, the staff is fine taking a step back next year. They are absolutely not.