LG hit it on the head about "what have you done for me lately?". and we're not alone. Ask Herb Sendec.
but i digress....several points over the last couple of pages i thought were interesting....
1. How many people bought in to last year's hype? I wasn't on this board at that time, so you'll have to take me at my word, but i didn't. I didn't think we'd suck as bad as we did, but i couldn't see us going w/1 loss or undefeated with the schedule we had. I thought 2 losses for sure, and after i saw ND play, that game at south bend loomed large. i figured 9-2, and no shot a NC.
2. what caused last year? was it a fluke? several good points brought up on this subject, and for me after watchin the whole season, we looked like a bad football team. We couldn't catch, we turned the ball over, we committed penalties and we lacked severly in special teams. The offensive woes i do not contribute to play calling or game planning. It was execution plain and simple. that's coaching. And i think our coaches and players bought in to the hype and figured someone would do something sometime to get us out of the mess we were in. unfortunately, that only happened once against LSU.
i understand the word fluke for last year. but fluke can be good or bad, just like luck. Some times the flukes happen because a defense has a bust and the offense gets a big play. same could be said for turnovers etc....last year, our inability to execute on offense and special teams (turonvers, inability to convert 3rd downs etc....)led to many opportunities for opposing offenses to capitalize on good feild position.
3. ranking and this year's results. pre season rankings are a combination of last year's results (the closest factual evidence that given someone the ability to predict the future) and what incoming coaches/players etc. will impact the up coming season. For us, you combine the two, plus the Tennessee=tradition argument, i could see us getting a pre season ranking somewhere between 20-25. Personally, i don't think we should be ranked.
I do think this year won't suck anywhere as bad as last. That doesn't mean i think we'll be in the SECCG. I think we're capable of it. But so are 5 other teams in the SEC. all things being equal, UF and LSU should be flat out better than us. UGA, Bama, USC, TN are probably a lot closer to each other than we might like to admit. those are the games that we will need to win, in addition to Cal, to start thinking about successful seasons. I think we will lose one of those 4 and finish 9-3. But the difference between 9-3 and 8-4 at this point will come down to a few plays in any of those games.
I keep hearing about how much talent we have. I agree. We have SEC CG comparable talent to most every team in the SEC. But to say that we are that much more talented thatn some of the other big dogs in the conference isn't so. In the 90's, it was pretty clear there was 1. UF, 2. TN and everone else. Now a days, that gap is much tighter. Whether it be recent success, new coaches, whatever, those schools made those changes to compete with US. We (UF and UT) set the bar in the 90's, along with Bama in the early part of the 90s. It has taken everyone else 10 years to catch up to what we were doing.
I've said it before, and i'll continue to say it. I'm not against coaching changes. I think this year and next (yes, he'll be here for at least two more seasons, sorry folks) are the most important two years in CPF's tenure. He's made changes. He's got good talent. now, we'll find out if he can compete with the new look SEC. If he can (and i do think he can btw) then kudos to him for it. If he can't, then there won't be much of a choice but to make a change to remain competitive in this conference.
good discussion....
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Big Grin :D :D"
go vols