President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

#876
#876
LouderVol said:
you are making a distinction without a difference.

the argument is those individuals within the DOJ, FBI, SS, NIH etc etc are political creatures when they went after Trump for political reasons. so it is still lawfare to go after them.
Click to expand...
No, because they may have broke the law - political creatures or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ButchPlz
#881
#881
whodeycin85 said:
For me the use of lawfare is more about evening the playing field....if we dont respond in a similar manner the. The next time the Dems are i. Charge they will feel emboldened to go even further...hell they are still double and tripling down on all the false rhetoric and lie from the last 4 years...you have to even the playing field to eventually raise the playing field...the high road only works if your opponent is willing to meet you there. If not then you can have your moral high ground while the world around you burns.
Click to expand...
This! That's like people wanting the RNC & Republicans to return to who they were before Trump. That's 🐃💩, those Republicans wouldn't put up a fight and that brought about Obama and the extreme liberal left that we see today with DEI and all that 💩. Hopefully that Republican party died with McCain and when the never-Trumpers got beat and McConnell finally leaving.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN-POSSUM
#882
#882
C-south said:
Just want to let you know Ukraine launched long range missiles into Russia with Biden’s approval. Who knows what’s going to happen now but you can blame it on Trump.
Click to expand...
I know Biden gave his approval. I won't blame anything on djt except he promised to end it in 24 hours, before his Inauguration.
 
#883
#883
swampfoxfan said:
I know Biden gave his approval. I won't blame anything on djt except he promised to end it in 24 hours, before his Inauguration.
Click to expand...

He will probably stop support in 24 hours so it ends our involvement. Good enough for me. I doubt the war will be over, it might be just getting started.

let-them-fight.gif
 
#887
#887
Sandman 423 said:
What happened to our success will be our retribution?
Click to expand...

The American People need retribution, you know the people these crimes were in part against. In a just world, lots of people should be locked up, including black Jesus for murder. That guy indicts Obama, Biden and Hillary.... GOAT.
 
#888
#888
LSU-SIU said:
The American People need retribution, you know the people these crimes were in part against. In a just world, lots of people should be locked up, including black Jesus for murder. That guy indicts Obama, Biden and Hillary.... GOAT.
Click to expand...
Bush 2 and Cheney should be before Obama or Hillary
 
#891
#891
LSU-SIU said:
The American People need retribution, you know the people these crimes were in part against. In a just world, lots of people should be locked up, including black Jesus for murder. That guy indicts Obama, Biden and Hillary.... GOAT.
Click to expand...

Retribution would be axing their beloved federal government down to size. Putting them on trial/prison does nothing for the country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolsAgainstTheWorld15, 85SugarVol, LouderVol and 2 others
#892
#892
LouderVol said:
right, just like the D's believed going after Trump for taxes and procedural crimes and everything else was just enforcing the laws.

when you are specifically targeting POLITICAL ENEMIES for specific enforcement of select laws in order to punish them for past actions that is lawfare.
Click to expand...
So you don't believe that 51 intelligent agents that signed that fraudulent federal paperwork to get a warrant should be charged??? Do you consider any enforcement of the law against a political opponents as lawfare?? Cuz the legal definition is more specific.
 
#893
#893
whodeycin85 said:
So you don't believe that 51 intelligent agents that signed that fraudulent federal paperwork to get a warrant should be charged??? Do you consider any enforcement of the law against a political opponents as lawfare?? Cuz the legal definition is more specific.
Click to expand...

It does no good to charge them. Better to release all the information and publicly disgrace them and the media that reported their lies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LouderVol and GroverCleveland
#896
#896
hog88 said:
It does no good to charge them. Better to release all the information and publicly disgrace them and the media that reported their lies.
Click to expand...
How is that any different then say leaking the ethics report on Gaetz..isn't that just doing the same thing the Dems have historically done? I thought the point y'all were making was to be better, so enforcing laws bad, smearing in public good..
 
#897
#897
whodeycin85 said:
How is that any different then say leaking the ethics report on Gaetz..isn't that just doing the same thing the Dems have historically done? I thought the point y'all were making was to be better, so enforcing laws bad, smearing in public good..
Click to expand...

What laws did those intelligence operatives break?

Yes, I'm saying be better. Don't leak the information put it out publicly and openly.
 
#899
#899
hog88 said:
What laws did those intelligence operatives break?

Yes, I'm saying be better. Don't leak the information put it out publicly and openly.
Click to expand...
Would the charge of Bob menendez be lawfare??
They falsified a federal document to get a warrant. That's illegal correct???
I'm not saying go after pelosi for insider trading etc...im saying enforce existing laws for crime committed...dont change SOL to charge, don't charge on no evidence..etc..if justice in blind and there isn't supposed to be a tier justice system then how is treating political opponents differently then citizens being better?
 
#900
#900
hog88 said:
I'm not exactly sure how this came about, this subdivision has been in place for 20-30 years and their retention pond needs to be dredged. Out of the blue ACOE shows up and says this pond is fed by and is part of an intermittent stream. It's on their map but is nowhere to be found on the ground.

I'm betting one of the homeowners did some research and complained thinking it would get them out of paying the assessment.
Click to expand...
we actually got one official out there to walk the site to see the creek. We walked out with them into the woods, and then stopped after a while. Official got confused, asked where the creek was. we told them their map said about 20 feet back the way we came, didn't he see it? He was flabbergasted but said if it was on a map it was darn near impossible to remove.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top