President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

Equal to being taxed to support a grotesquely bloated war machine.
thats an interesting take. and as with all things luther, completely inconsistent.

you have never been on the side of cuts. you have never admitted to any of the darker sides of the "greater good". and you certainly haven't cared about what is actually in the Constitution, preferring to throw in things that aren't.
 
I'm for reducing the size government. I'm team Carter/Clinton.
I hated that Reagan sent us down this road of spiraling debt.
bs, no one buys that. you are actively engaged in a conversation to expand social and economic welfare, falsely trying to claim its in the Constitution.
 
snooze.........

The question included the word "fair". I answered the question asked.

Troll better.
Keep trolling. The word "fair" in this context (and I'm 100% certain you're aware) is in application. "Common defense" is 100% fair Constitutionally to the entirety of the nation across the board, You and everyone else knows that's not what Louder's post asked.

We know Loother is gonna Loother but put in a better effort.
 
thats an interesting take. and as with all things luther, completely inconsistent.

you have never been on the side of cuts. you have never admitted to any of the darker sides of the "greater good". and you certainly haven't cared about what is actually in the Constitution, preferring to throw in things that aren't.
?????????????
I proposed across the board cuts in the PF years ago.
 
bs, no one buys that. you are actively engaged in a conversation to expand social and economic welfare, falsely trying to claim its in the Constitution.
?????????
Point out where I am advocating for expanding social and economic welfare,
When you realize you cannot, have the decency to apologize.
 
?????????????
I proposed across the board cuts in the PF years ago.
you proposed what you thought would be a political "gotcha". thinking the Rs wouldn't accept cuts to the military you have proposed accepting half the rate cuts for everything else. it was always someone else having to agree to more cuts, before you were willing to consider your own cuts.

if you actually cared about any of it, you wouldn't have started the heaviest with the item the Constitution calls for.
 
From the article: "He voted for Trump and said he supports reducing the size of the federal government but not this way." 🤣
That’s actually a pretty reasonable thing to say.

The administration tacitly endorsed it this week by changing their approach to restructuring the government.

I support eating chocolate chip cookies, but not this way.

1741292363274.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: swampfoxfan
Keep trolling. The word "fair" in this context (and I'm 100% certain you're aware) is in application. "Common defense" is 100% fair Constitutionally to the entirety of the nation across the board, You and everyone else knows that's not what Louder's post asked.

We know Loother is gonna Loother but put in a better effort.
Uh, I'm an "everyone else" suggest that when you defend tRump you do so without using his proclivity to lie.
 
Uh, I'm an "everyone else" suggest that when you defend tRump you do so without using his proclivity to lie.
What the ever loving blue monkey humping hell does anything I posted have to do with Trump? In fact, how could it even possibly be construed as having anything to do with Trump?

Maybe you accidentally quoted my post?
 
Here's a replacement:


Were you listening at the :30 mark?

"Nothing to do with Trump! Trump's programs aren't even in yet! And I got people on the left who are blaming Trump. How can you blame Trump when he wasn't President when these seeds were planted?"

It has to be embarrassing when your support link literally destroys your argument. Hope this never happens to you in court.
 
Were you listening at the :30 mark?

"Nothing to do with Trump! Trump's programs aren't even in yet! And I got people on the left who are blaming Trump. How can you blame Trump when he wasn't President when these seeds were planted?"

It has to be embarrassing when your support link literally destroys your argument. Hope this never happens to you in court.
LOL. I've never watched on of their insipid tweets. But it's funny when someone did, it contradicted their premise.

I thought someone who treated us to KamalaWins tweets incessantly, would have better judgement.
 
?????????
Point out where I am advocating for expanding social and economic welfare,
When you realize you cannot, have the decency to apologize.
you are right, apologies. you didn't argue for EXPANDING them. you are just arguing that they are Constitutional and shouldn't be cut...unlike everything else, that you do think should be cut.
 

VN Store



Back
Top