You might be right, though in reality, I asked a question. To which the possible answers are YES, NO, and MAYBE. And dovernvolz, babie, liberal isn't an insult. If it wasn't for liberals, you'd still be under the heel of some monarch or another. Or exploited by some company that forbade workers forming a union to protect them from blatant exploitation.
Install Kamala as president, and let her shine brightly her sheer incompetence, and lead her party to defeat in '24.
Surely you aren’t comparing the patriots that armed themselves to free us from a monarchy to liberals are you ? Let me guess , they were liberals then , we are gonna just call them demarcates when they had slaves and the republicans stopped slavery , and now we are calling them patriot / socialist liberals ? Unions are only as strong as their weakest members in their local . most unions now are no different that a corporate entity that’s working under master contracts , and is more about protecting the union than the workers .
Human beings in any era aren't and never have been perfect. The species is too busy being hypocritical, all while denying it and blaming somebody else for their contemporary social realities.
You just attributed the freedom from a monarchy and protection from big corporations to liberals while ignoring the the underbelly and bad times of the party . So we just acknowledge that we are hypocrites, blame others and move on ? Smh