President Joe Biden - Kamala Harris Administration

[LSU-SIU]

Sorry, I don't want 4 more years of the same ole same ole. Stay on task and get the economy rolling.

Actually, I would say you are going to get the same ole, if you keep on doing the same ole thing i.e. not putting people in jail. Why do you think is all going on? You have to put people in jail... that hasn't happened.

 

[NCFisher]

I would say generally they should be prosecuted if there is evidence that shows a crime was committed, whether they are capable of standing trial (aid in their defense) at that particular time is a whole other matter. But even if he can't stand for trial, he could be held until he is able to assist in the defense.

No reason has to be given to receive a pardon. To me they are separate things. In this case, whether any of that occurs, he for sure has information of federal crimes being committed which the government nor the public know about.

Keep in mind the things Biden and administration should be investigated for is wide-ranging. I consider the weaponization of law against Trump, those in his presidential circle, GOP voters, parents, RTLife advocates, religious groups to be infinitely more important than the Bidens corruption. That includes the burreacratic deep state actors in intel and law enforcement. That's the enduring danger, not Joe's corruption.

Investigate and record for posterity the Bidens' corruption and, if you can nail some of them - great! - but don't prosecute Joe, even though karma says he's deserving.

 

[LSU-SIU]

Keep in mind the things Biden and administration should be investigated for is wide-ranging. I consider the weaponization of law against Trump, those in his presidential circle, GOP voters, parents, RTLife advocates, religious groups to be infinitely more important than the Bidens corruption. That includes the burreacratic deep state actors in intel and law enforcement. That's the enduring danger., not Joe's corruption.

Investigate and record for posterity the Bidens' corruption and, if you can nail some of them - great! - but don't prosecute Joe, even though karma says he's deserving.

Well, since I believe he is murderer I would probably be on the other side of that. But would they do it to Trump? Yes, how do I know. They already did.

As far as bringing Joe into a Grand Jury/Congress, he doesn't have to be the target... he would have to provide the information as to the crimes he gave pre-indictment pardons for. That is where this should start at least on the pardon front.

What are the crimes he gave pre-indictment pardons?

 

[Buddy’s Bandit]

I would rather us just move on.

We cannot do this. It must be exposed so it never happens again.

 

[swampfoxfan]

You wouldn't know she was "armed" with a folding pocket-knife in her pants pocket until you shot her and she was searched. She brandished no weapon. Byrd and witnesses testified she was not armed. You can scratch that off the justification list.

Further, there is no indication Babbitt was violent at any point. In fact, that linked video and testimony of the indie journo who captured likely indicate she put herself between rioters/protesters and police, casually chatted with them, and tried to keep an agitator (Zachary Alam) from breaking the windows.

You have to be pretty dense, why not just goggle the incident and watch it yourself? Nope makes more sense to take your info from a fellow Maga.
The claim she was peaceful is pure BS

 

[swampfoxfan]

Lol how do you know the woman outside your window has “violent intentions”? Can you just see it in her eyes?

Maybe the backpack is holding one of those double dongs.

That whole line is stupidity. Do you even think before you post?

You magas sure have a hang up with fake body parts, maybe you should free yourself and step out of the closet

 

[LSU-SIU]

Keep in mind the things Biden and administration should be investigated for is wide-ranging. I consider the weaponization of law against Trump, those in his presidential circle, GOP voters, parents, RTLife advocates, religious groups to be infinitely more important than the Bidens corruption. That includes the burreacratic deep state actors in intel and law enforcement. That's the enduring danger, not Joe's corruption.

Investigate and record for posterity the Bidens' corruption and, if you can nail some of them - great! - but don't prosecute Joe, even though karma says he's deserving.

Does he seem like he is going to let it slide? You have a whole family that not only committed federal crimes but try to railroad this guy.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[NCFisher]

You have to be pretty dense, why not just goggle the incident and watch it yourself? Nope makes more sense to take your info from a fellow Maga.
The claim she was peaceful is pure BS

I've seen all the videos; again, there is no indication she was violent.
Or armed, an assertion you conveniently dropped just now as justification for shooting her.

 

[NCFisher]

Well, since I believe he is murderer I would probably be on the other side of that. But would they do it to Trump? Yes, how do I know. They already did.

As far as bringing Joe into a Grand Jury/Congress, he doesn't have to be the target... he would have to provide the information as to the crimes he gave pre-indictment pardons for. That is where this should start at least on the pardon front.

What are the crimes he gave pre-indictment pardons?

Biden is mentally incontinent, as Mike Johnson's relating of their talk about halting NG exports demonstrates, in addition to his repeated demonstrations of senility. Along with Robert Hur's investigation.

I dont' think a judge or jury would permit him to take the stand very long.

 

[NCFisher]

Does he seem like he is going to let it slide? You have a whole family that not only committed federal crimes but try to railroad this guy.

I agree; and there are plenty of them that can and should be investigated with plenty of evidence that doesn't include parading a senile man in front of a jury/judge that will not let him remain on the stand.

Under the Biden regime, his cabinet and admins, starting with the DOJ, and the J6C, are prime targets for the last four years. Under Trump's first term, you have the Obama counterparts and inherited bureaucrats.

There are plenty of lucid, mentally competent people to pursue investigatively.

 

[LSU-SIU]

Biden is mentally incontinent, as Mike Johnson's relating of their talk about halting NG exports demonstrates, in addition to his repeated demonstrations of senility. Along with Robert Hur's investigation.

I dont' think a judge or jury would permit him to take the stand very long.

Grand Juries and Congress first collect the information, all the information doesn't need to be the truth or real. Johnson has already indicated there will be action on this front as their should be if you want to save this country. Whether or not Joe is a potato isn't really relevant at this stage. At this stage, all we know is crime(s) have been committed. People with mental disabilities are questioned under oath all the time in civil and criminal proceedings. Logically, you run separately... the government has a legal obligation to find out as does Congress. If Joe had put the crime on the pardon or indicted these people than we wouldn't have to go on a fishing expedition.

You can add General Cupcake to the mix. What crimes is a dementia patient pardoning him for?

 

[Franklin Pierce]

Biden clemency for 'non-violent' inmates includes Connecticut Child Killer​

Adrian Peeler was accused of shooting an 8-year-old in the back of the head before killing his mother​

A 48-year-old Connecticut drug kingpin who killed a mother and her 8-year-old son so she wouldn't testify against his brother has received a commutation as part of former President Joe Biden's clemency for nearly 2,500 federal inmates he described as "non-violent."

Adrian Peeler, a Bridgeport drug trafficker, killed a woman named Karen Clarke and her son just weeks before they were supposed to testify against his brother, who was accused of shooting Clarke's boyfriend in front of the child.

Biden clemency for 'non-violent' inmates includes Connecticut child killer

Adrian Peeler convicted of conspiracy to murder in case that left a mother and her son dead before they could testify against his brother, another killer.

www.foxnews.com

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Biden clemency for 'non-violent' inmates includes Connecticut Child Killer​

Adrian Peeler was accused of shooting an 8-year-old in the back of the head before killing his mother​

A 48-year-old Connecticut drug kingpin who killed a mother and her 8-year-old son so she wouldn't testify against his brother has received a commutation as part of former President Joe Biden's clemency for nearly 2,500 federal inmates he described as "non-violent."

Adrian Peeler, a Bridgeport drug trafficker, killed a woman named Karen Clarke and her son just weeks before they were supposed to testify against his brother, who was accused of shooting Clarke's boyfriend in front of the child.

Biden clemency for 'non-violent' inmates includes Connecticut child killer

Adrian Peeler convicted of conspiracy to murder in case that left a mother and her son dead before they could testify against his brother, another killer.

www.foxnews.com

Apparently, Biden/democrats don't care about that. Republicans are the Evil ones.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[NCFisher]

Grand Juries and Congress first collect the information, all the information doesn't need to be the truth or real. Johnson has already indicated there will be action on this front as their should be if you want to save this country. Whether or not Joe is a potato isn't really relevant at this stage. At this stage, all we know is crime(s) have been committed. People with mental disabilities are questioned under oath all the time in civil and criminal proceedings. Logically, you run separately... the government has a legal obligation to find out as does Congress. If Joe had put the crime on the pardon or indicted these people than we wouldn't have to go on a fishing expedition.

Biden has already said the pardon are issued strictly to prevent unfair partisan persecution of these people, and "should not be mistaken as an acknowledgment that any individual engaged in any wrongdoing, nor should acceptance be misconstrued as an admission of guilt for any offense."

What more than repeating that until he's yanked off stage, do you expect they'll get from him?

 

[LSU-SIU]

Biden has already said the pardon are issued strictly to prevent unfair partisan persecution of these people, and "should not be mistaken as an acknowledgment that any individual engaged in any wrongdoing, nor should acceptance be misconstrued as an admission of guilt for any offense."

What more than repeating that until he's yanked off stage, do you expect they'll get from him?

The SC ruling I linked previous they say a crime happened for their to be a pardon, without the crime the pardon doesn't exist. Biden tried to be cute, as Hunter was trying to run a fast one. What Hunter tried to do is run a motion to dismiss after the pardon, what DOJ said is.... no, the case still stands... you have accept the pardon guilt by docketing the pardon.

Biden can set conditions for the pardon but no for there to be pardon, there must be a crime. Biden is saying, my family committed crime(s), I am giving them a get out jail free card.

What more than repeating that until he's yanked off stage, do you expect they'll get from him?

That's the job of Congress and DOJ. Not sure what the big deal is, people testify every day.

 

[NCFisher]

The SC ruling I linked previous they say a crime happened for their to be a pardon, without the crime the pardon doesn't exist.

Understood that before you posted it prior; my reply was premised on assumption they'd accept the pardon if needed in the event of prosecution.

So, yank Garland, Fauci, J. Smith, C. Hutchinson, Milley, Biden family members, J6 committee, Wray, tech mavens, etc in for congressional testimony while DOJ separately investigates. I'm only disagreeing with thinking Joe is going to be of utility in the process, or that he should be prosecuted.

 

[LSU-SIU]

Understood that before you posted it prior; my reply was premised on assumption they'd accept the pardon if needed in the event of prosecution.

So, yank Garland, Fauci, J. Smith, C. Hutchinson, Milley, Biden family members, J6 committee, Wray, tech mavens, etc in for congressional testimony while DOJ separately investigates. I'm only disagreeing with thinking Joe is going to be of utility in the process, or that he should be prosecuted.

The pardon is basically moot until criminal jeopardy attaches i.e. indictment, criminal charges filed, etc.

In the case of Hunter, oh he tried and tried. What his attorney did was file a motion to dismiss, doj wasn't playing that game. Hunter was trying to act like the case was dismiss without filing the pardon with the court i.e. acceptance of guilt. They than tried to link a copy from the white house website, but the court didn't play that game either. Basically, a defendant is accepting the charges are true in exchange for the relief in the pardon. In the case of Hunter, he was already found guilty by a jury and was awaiting sentencing. At this stage Hunter can't plead the 5th on testimony in that time period as criminal jeopardy can no longer attach.

 

[Buddy’s Bandit]

Understood that before you posted it prior; my reply was premised on assumption they'd accept the pardon if needed in the event of prosecution.

So, yank Garland, Fauci, J. Smith, C. Hutchinson, Milley, Biden family members, J6 committee, Wray, tech mavens, etc in for congressional testimony while DOJ separately investigates. I'm only disagreeing with thinking Joe is going to be of utility in the process, or that he should be prosecuted.

So you agree crime pays and we should be a lawless country ? No one is above the law Including jb.

 

[85SugarVol]

That whole line is stupidity. Do you even think before you post?

You magas sure have a hang up with fake body parts, maybe you should free yourself and step out of the closet

Lol.

Everyone who disagrees with me is a dirty Maga!
- Swamp

 

[LouderVol]

I 100% guarantee if a DC homeowner applied a similar standard he would be charged and tried.

you are relying on what you probably think as a BS standard to justify this.

in common sense land no one assumes self defense doesn't apply when someone breaking in a window and climbing in to get after you.

 

[LSU-SIU]

Lol.

Everyone who disagrees with me is a dirty Maga!
- Swamp

Heck, I'm a dirty maga and I'm not even registered to vote. I get none of the benefits and all the problems of it.

 

[LouderVol]

Moving on constantly is also why we have politicians that think (know) they can abuse the taxpayer and the American political system.

but lawfare is the better option?