LouderVol
Extra and Terrestrial
- Joined
- May 19, 2014
- Messages
- 55,558
- Likes
- 55,748
Presidential Pardons only deal with violations of federal law, which is why some of these crime should be investigated as it could involve multiple jurisdictions which could be prosecuted. Further, the pardons do not stop civil process at the federal level.not at the federal level. but I thought if you break a state law you can be still charged.
If I read that correctly, a pardon isn't really considered in effect until it's accepted, and it isn't considered accepted until there are charges. As such, "accepting" the pardon is basically a guilty plea. So, it means a lot that the process can and should happen. That acceptance takes "pleading the 5th" off the table, so they have to answer questions honestly as part of the process.not at the federal level. but I thought if you break a state law you can be still charged.
Yea, they can still be charged by a State in one of LG’s “completely unrelated and uncoordinated” actions.not at the federal level. but I thought if you break a state law you can be still charged.
Gerald Ford’s pardon of Nixon was preemptive.
I have no idea what will happen if these people get called to testify.
They can obviously still be pursued by a State AG or DA.
But this overturning of a Presidential Pardon is fool’s gold.
We have never had a mentally incapacitated president before Biden though. Don't you find it frightening that he was ruled incompetent to be charged, but he still had the capacity to enact all the other aspects of that office?Because the Presidential Pardon power is absolute.
There is no mechanism to challenge it.
None. Zero. Zilch. Nada.
Of course.We have never had a mentally incapacitated president before Biden though. Don't you find it frightening that he was ruled incompetent to be charged, but he still had the capacity to enact all the other aspects of that office?
It can? Where?It can still be challenged. The extenuating circumstances were clearly dangerous. What if it can be proved he didn't know what he was signing?
I watched the Lockerbie series about Pan Am 103 on CNN.Wilson and Reagan come to mind.
He wasn't afflicted as much as Biden but he wasn't all there either. Like Biden he was managed for appearance.I watched the Lockerbie series about Pan Am 103 on CNN.
There a lot of clips of Reagan in ‘87-‘88. A time we know now that he was in early dementia.
Official statements, press conferences, speeches, ad lib gaggles, soundbites on the street. So plenty of views.
It was absolutely night and day watching him vs what we just saw with Biden. No comparison.
Reagan appeared so lucid and clear and focused. It was really something.