It is irrelevant. Exactly right.
Even if you don’t believe there’s any direct corruption involved, that it’s just extreme incompetence, that doesn’t suddenly make it excusable. And honestly, if the conference is happy to continue to employ incompetent crews and make no investment or effort to improve such a crucial aspect of the competitive integrity of the sport, well that’s just a different form of corruption.
I think you misunderstand
@Ulysees E. McGill's post. He says that all the evidence (the actual calls and no-calls, over long periods of time -- and in this particular game in spades --
and the lack of their opposite to any meaningful extent at all -- rules out as impossible that it is mere incompetence, which would even out. Nothing has ever evened out. Therefore, he says, incompetence is excluded as a reasonable account.
His point in the post is that one does not require certain of proof of the precise backstory in order to read the pattern of extremely one-sided facts for what it tells.
The fact of the matter is that Tennessee gets screwed repeatedly. (And I will add that Saturday was the most biased, rigging officiating I have ever witnessed.)
Regardless of whatever account one gives, McGill is saying, as to how that flagrant inequality comes to be (ill will toward Tennessee, Tennessee as a threat to frontrunners, a design to advance other teams to the championship game to maximize profit, or
whatever one hypothesizes as the root of the pattern of facts, or even if one doesn't state the root cause at all), the facts themselves demonstrate that we are targeted by one-sided officiating.
This appears to me to be a response to people who repeatedly ask about details of what is happening behind the scenes, as if that disproves the obvious story that the facts themselves tell. It is a diversion, with no possibility of ever becoming a refutation of the pattern of manifest facts, which are available to any careful viewer. It wants to change the subject from the plain facts to a hypothetical backstory it can doubt or ask endless questions about.