Recruiting Football Talk VII

Status
Not open for further replies.
#35,655
#35,655
Orange. said:
You are extremely lucky that, as a determined and vociferous reality-denier and lap dog, you are too developmentally disadvantaged to understand that mockery is not an argument. Have it back on your level.
Click to expand...
You're right. I'll be right back with random screenshots and overly verbose paragraphs of nonsense to make people think I'm smart, but with absolutely zero statistical evidence that would actually prove it.

Anyway. How many Kroger fuel points did the refs from Saturday get you think?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BleedorangeinGA and knoxvol52
#35,657
#35,657
Jack Burton said:
Seems legit. Everything on TV is real.
View attachment 592056
Click to expand...
Not convinced? Here's another nugget about me. My uncle portrayed Atticus Finch 4 years ago in a play. I speak with him a few times a year. Through those conversations with someone that portrayed a famous attorney from a fictional novel in a local theater, I feel qualified to answer any legal questions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gus D's kernbred, Jack Burton, InVOLuntary and 6 others
#35,661
#35,661
Ten_Titans said:
You're right. I'll be right back with random screenshots and overly verbose paragraphs of nonsense to make people think I'm smart, but with absolutely zero statistical evidence that would actually prove it.

Anyway. How many Kroger fuel points did the refs from Saturday get you think?
Click to expand...
Agree to disagree. If you can't or won't see that something has been going on all year with calls and no calls in our games, there's no point in discussing it. It's been so over-the-top that even the AP game (!) was called in a manner that would never happen to another SEC team at home against a non-conference scrub. Some of it endangered player safety.

Plenty of statistical evidence has been posted from others, primarily focused on the near absence of non-pre-snap calls against our opponents. But you should at least admit that no statistics are collected on no-calls per se; one is required to spot them for one's self watching and rewatching broadcasts. That is what I have done. There's nothing wrong with it.

I would ask you to concede that one doesn't have to have a precise account of the "backstory" in order to assess the actual calls and no-calls in the actual games as extremely one-sided and a clear pattern to obtain. Deriding a particular backstory, or a comically exaggerated parody of a backstory, is not a counterargument. The facts of the calls and no-callls and their one-sided distribution are plainly demonstrable. Nothing with respect to the events themselves hinges on whatever backstory seems most likely to any one observer. I only insist that the pattern and persistence of the unidirectional bad calls and no-calls excludes "incompetence" as a reasonable account because accidents would have a more even-handed distribution.

But you do you and I'll be me. We don't have to agree.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SmokinBob, VolsDoc81TX, InVOLuntary and 6 others
#35,663
#35,663
Jimmy Football said:
Doesn’t shock me that South Carolina fans are picking up some of this info. A lot of media rumors float around during Super Bowl week.
Click to expand...
I was wondering why it was 'High Level Sources at South Carolina'. I'd work an angle to go to Michigan instead of Mich. State.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Glitch
#35,674
#35,674
UTSuave’ said:
If anyone is wondering about next season and stopping Georgia’s running game…this is their running back they lost in the spring 👀 can I get the Wes Rucker lifting weights in the offseason tweet👀😂😂😂

View attachment 592018
Click to expand...

If that's not shopped, that's not the kind of muscle you want to see on a player. He's like a body builder about to pop. Players need that thin layer of fat over muscle. That fat is an energy and stamina source as well as protective.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UTSuave’, hooter vol, Enki_Amenra and 1 other person
#35,675
#35,675
MarcoVol said:
Click to expand...

So zero seasons through 8 games (other than Heup's team last year) that were better than this year.

But why stop at 15 years? Include post-national-championship Fulmer. I count only 4 of 10 years with a better record than this year after 8 games.

Of those 4 of 10 post-championship Fulmer years with records equal to Heup's present season: 1 team lost 1 additional game after the 8th week; 2 years Fulmer lost 2 additional games, and 1 year he lost 4 additional games after the 8th week.

2008: 3-5
2007: 5-3
2006: 7-1
2005: 3-5
2004: 7-1
2003: 6-2
2002: 5-3
2001: 7-1
2000: 5-3
1999: 7-1

FF mental dwarfs and even some few here who disrespect what Heup is accomplishing is astonishing.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SmokinBob, VolsDoc81TX, JacketVol and 20 others
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top