UTProf
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2010
- Messages
- 12,739
- Likes
- 30,629
Golesh definitely was the key to our offense, besides Hooker obviously
Blue font's missing.
Golesh was an outstanding assistant and ready to be HC. His loss was absolutely felt but Heupel was calling those plays. The "key" wasn't Golesh or even Hooker, although Hooker was a big factor. The key rather was several keys - QB, WRs, TE, and a giant loss at RT.** What we returned from that year's offense was a Center who missed the first few games due to injury, the RB corps, one super-senior TE in Warren, Bru McCoy was injured early in the season, and Ramel Keyton who never managed to play up to the level he had the year prior.
Again Golesh was an outstanding assistant but Heupel has produced on offense everywhere he's been as both an OC and as an HC who has had several OC's. We lost the best college WR in college football, a Heisman candidate QB, and a first round draft pick at LT but people act like somehow Heupel's a moron who has been exposed. Not to mention our offense was by no measure bad this year.
ETA: Corrected LT to RT because unlike @butchna I still struggle telling my left from my right.
Last edited: