You want to know why? They were playing 3 safeties deep a lot. They were taking those plays away and Joe struggled with accuracy on routes in the middle of the field. We had some big plays when he hit them. Joe was no where as good a HH and part of his completion percentage was the total amount of bubble screens he completed. Percentage up but yards suffer and so does the O. We scored over 40 per game with Hooker and no where close with JM. Clemson game was tighter than it should've been and we hit a couple late but our offense struggled some that game and that bothered me going into the season. Milton in no way was close to the QB Hooker was. Hooker should've been in NY for the Heisman and Joe was no where close. That tells you more than any of us can. Not knocking Joe when you say he is not as good as Hooker. Not many have been.I assumed when you say explosive plays you were referring to the deep ball bc we thrived throwing it deep in prior years. We've always had explosive plays in the run so I wasn't including those.
I would say we didn't have explosive plays in the passing game bc we didn't call many. Why? Who knows. I wasn't trying to go down this lane (not sure how I got here lol).
Original topic, plenty of blame, reasons, factors, we weren't as good on offense as years past. That's all I'm saying.