Enki_Amenra
Wanna Bet?
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2012
- Messages
- 43,111
- Likes
- 219,309
HahahahaYou're gonna need a lot of this:
View attachment 606164
I wouldn’t bank on the INTs. Have a bad feeling we play super soft zone with our inexperience in secondary, and get lit up by a paltry offense. Lit up by them would be anything over 200 yards.Watching Iowa highlights... They look like a really bad Kentucky.
Also, oof. Nebraska is such a bad team.
Also, Iowa's secondary is going to get torched tomorrow, and I'm predicting we get at least two interceptions.
The exceptions should not be used as the rule when it comes to perception...so of course this is a generalization...but it's a generalization with proven merit.that bottom comment is unfair, and very sweeping. is me saying 'most sports commentators with SM accounts, are like adolescents,' also a sweeping generalization?
One thing we can all agree in is that it needs to change. Further that the NCAA will absolutely **** this up.
Which is the exact opposite of what the Lions claim. One side is wrong. Why do you assume it's the Lions? Could just as easily be the official.Because the official answered the pool reporter question by saying, “70 had been reporting all game and came over to me to report. He was actually not eligible and didn’t need to report.”