Ten_Titans
All Mustard No Ketchup
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2010
- Messages
- 11,655
- Likes
- 30,311
I'm not aware of a single person besides volbeast who doesn't care about it. Or about Bama's criminality. It's not an either/or. And in both cases the NCAA is covering for their privileged favorites.It's mind blowing how people don't care about Harbaugh creating an entire department to cheat. I just don't get it.
he looked huge yesterday....i hadn't seen him or recalled seeing him...i was surprised at how big he was.
They're not the same thing. The NCAA has concrete, hard evidence for what Michigan did. They have circumstantial, hearsay, probable evidence for what Bama used to do (paying recruits, now it's legal).I'm not aware of a single person besides volbeast who doesn't care about it. Or about Bama's criminality. It's not an either/or. And in both cases the NCAA is covering for their privileged favorites.
I think you're getting mislead by a guy using Michigan to make excuse for
That’s what I don’t get by the brigade on here saying Ole miss is going “all in” lol… if Ole Miss is going “all in” they wouldn’t be paying McDonald whatever it is they are paying lol. Aside from Nolen and Baron who are good, guys like that Florida DE who routinely takes plays off and McDonald won’t move the needle for them on defense. Those are desperation moves because they have a talent deficiency on defense if they are taking guys like that.
They're not the same thing. The NCAA has concrete, hard evidence for what Michigan did. They have circumstantial, hearsay, probable evidence for what Bama used to do (paying recruits, now it's legal).
The evidence against Harbaugh is overwhelming and crystal clear. There's no plausible deniability like Saban has. Yes we all know Saban payed players forever, but he did it smartly enough where he could blame rogue boosters if they ever tried to convict him.
There's literal video evidence of Harbaugh and his coordinators consulting Stallions for stolen signs and reacting accordingly. There's a literal paper trail of his travels to opponents' games.
It's different.
I don't believe the NCAA wanted evidence on Bama or they would have it. And you're omitting that Bama has completely corrupted SEC officiating. In so doing they have corrupted the playoffs for years and years.They're not the same thing. The NCAA has concrete, hard evidence for what Michigan did. They have circumstantial, hearsay, probable evidence for what Bama used to do (paying recruits, now it's legal).
The evidence against Harbaugh is overwhelming and crystal clear. There's no plausible deniability like Saban has. Yes we all know Saban payed players forever, but he did it smartly enough where he could blame rogue boosters if they ever tried to convict him.
There's literal video evidence of Harbaugh and his coordinators consulting Stallions for stolen signs and reacting accordingly. There's a literal paper trail of his travels to opponents' games.
It's different.
I agree. Most of the big schools were actively paying players. The one thing that gets me fiery mad about Bama is it is obvious the officiating bias because of the home office being in their back door. That part is blatant collusion, with the fox living in the hen house. It is so commonplace I believe they genuinely don't see it. The money is a silly argument to me though. Just look back to Cam Newton and others. I posted up that stat that Bama's only losses came when they did not have SEC refs.They're not the same thing. The NCAA has concrete, hard evidence for what Michigan did. They have circumstantial, hearsay, probable evidence for what Bama used to do (paying recruits, now it's legal).
The evidence against Harbaugh is overwhelming and crystal clear. There's no plausible deniability like Saban has. Yes we all know Saban payed players forever, but he did it smartly enough where he could blame rogue boosters if they ever tried to convict him.
There's literal video evidence of Harbaugh and his coordinators consulting Stallions for stolen signs and reacting accordingly. There's a literal paper trail of his travels to opponents' games.
It's different.
But Saban isn't directly responsible for the league office cheating for him. They're backing him and giving him favorable treatment via officiating and other things, but that's not the same thing as him directly cheating. He's just lucky enough they chose to back him and give Bama favorable treatment. We should hate the SEC more than Saban for that.I agree. Most of the big schools were actively paying players. The one thing that gets me fiery mad about Bama is it is obvious the officiating bias because of the home office being in their back door. That part is blatant collusion, with the fox living in the hen house. It is so commonplace I believe they genuinely don't see it. The money is a silly argument to me though. Just look back to Cam Newton and others. I posted up that stat that Bama's only losses came when they did not have SEC refs.