Orange_Crush
Resident windbag genius
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2004
- Messages
- 37,956
- Likes
- 75,557
It is just as ignorant. You can't make irrational reasoning rational by justifying it with other irrational reasoning.Come on. You know darned good and well that this board crows every single year about UK being an automatic W. Same for Vandy. Every...single...season. Look back at the posts. You know it's true. So if it's ignorant for me to look at the UF series the same way, then it's just as ignorant for every UT fan to see the UK game that way. But is it so ignorant when history is there for the viewing? Look at it from a betting standpoint. If you'd made your bets based on history, how would your winnings look vs if you just looked at who had the better team on paper or what the rankings said? How many times have we had the better team on paper only to lose to "that trash UF program"? How many times have we beaten a superior UF team? Same deal with UK but in reverse. You can spout off about being realistic with expectations and taking a logical look at each team each year, but you simply cannot deny history. And yes, we now have Nico, but we also had Manning who turned out to be one of the greatest of all time in college/pro football. A sure HOF guy. How did his record look vs UF? How many NFL players did UT churn out during his time at UT? So, again, I'll believe a win vs UF when I see it...on an annual basis, but hey, you do you.
As to the rest of your post, already answered:
...all based on superstitions from decades past, the results of players and staffs that are no longer here, against players and staffs that are no longer there.
...