Recruiting Football Talk VII

Status
Not open for further replies.
Their “unfair advantage” was the OLD WAY. There’s no “maintaining” what is GONE. Saban left most likely due to that inevitable fact. The days of picking out your favorite red Dodge Charger off of one of his parking lots and getting a bag man to give you some Krystal’s coupons went the way of Blockbuster.
NM
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smokey19rt
I think they feel like they can spend $13 million on their team and get away with it, current NCAA in tact, but if the lawsuits are successful, then the playing field is leveled and their advantage and protection is gone. Thus I could see this as their way of attempting to maintain control. Start a new association that they still control.

That may not at ALL be what it’s about, but do you think they want to start a new association or advisory panel to help UT, make sure there is parity and competitive balance?
Do you think the SEC is weak? Or do you think the SEC will conspire against UT as well? And with UT and TN as a state showing enough strength to ramrod the NCAA, would the new oversight be prone to just conspire against us?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Volunteer821
Well after 3 days of reading the tea leaves, I believe there is someone or some team out there that is afraid of competing against Nico Iamaleava. I first thought it was Alabama, but since the chair of NCAA Division 1 board of directors is University of Georgia President Jere W. Morehead, I think Kirby and his band of merry men don't want to have to defend a Nico Iamaleava run offense. The NCAA knows it won't win in court, but they are still butthurt that they didn't nail us on the Pruitt scandal and will find that suspending or forcing Nico off our team will be a payback and punishment enough, even if they look silly in court. The question is, will they succeed in suspending Nico or reaching a deal with his family like, hit the portal and we'll leave you alone. JMHO.
 
Well after 3 days of reading the tea leaves, I believe there is someone or some team out there that is afraid of competing against Nico Iamaleava. I first thought it was Alabama, but since the chair of NCAA Division 1 board of directors is University of Georgia President Jere W. Morehead, I think Kirby and his band of merry men don't want to have to defend a Nico Iamaleava run offense. The NCAA knows it won't win in court, but they are still butthurt that they didn't nail us on the Pruitt scandal and will find that suspending or forcing Nico off our team will be a payback and punishment enough, even if they look silly in court. The question is, will they succeed in suspending Nico or reaching a deal with his family like, hit the portal and we'll leave you alone. JMHO.
I think it’s saban.
 
Well after 3 days of reading the tea leaves, I believe there is someone or some team out there that is afraid of competing against Nico Iamaleava. I first thought it was Alabama, but since the chair of NCAA Division 1 board of directors is University of Georgia President Jere W. Morehead, I think Kirby and his band of merry men don't want to have to defend a Nico Iamaleava run offense. The NCAA knows it won't win in court, but they are still butthurt that they didn't nail us on the Pruitt scandal and will find that suspending or forcing Nico off our team will be a payback and punishment enough, even if they look silly in court. The question is, will they succeed in suspending Nico or reaching a deal with his family like, hit the portal and we'll leave you alone. JMHO.
No. There is zero chance that UT allows that to happen, particularly since that would effectively be allowing the NCAA to win.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top