sutro
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2010
- Messages
- 126
- Likes
- 745
In our pluralistic society, it's hard to fall back on individual relative ethics. I don't think we'll solve that here. And for the record, I've never needed or asked you to agree with me. I'm just befuddled that we've spent two pages debating whether the old system cost the student athletes. It's surreal, actually.I am 100% with you on thinking of the NCAA that way. It drives me crazy when people talk about the NCAA as “a single thing.”
And, yes, that’s what creates the competition law hook. And I understand the reading of the Sherman Act that implicates the NCAA, but I think it should be obvious that the Sherman Act was not intended to make amateur sports per se illegal. From a statutory construction perspective, I think the original intent is relevant to how we read the statute, but nevertheless, we could solve it by amending the Sherman Act, and maybe we should.
Like Teddy Lehman, I care more about “what’s right” (i.e. in my words, good policy) than about “the law of the land” (i.e. how a court has interpreted the Sherman Act at present).
Amateur sports would still exist. Every university has the option to start intramural football.I don’t, at all. I care about amateur sports continuing to exist.
It’s only undeniable in comparison to an alternate universe in which they can walk into court and accuse the universities of behaving illegally for offering non-compensated athletic teams as an extracurricular activity.In our pluralistic society, it's hard to fall back on individual relative ethics. I don't think we'll solve that here. And for the record, I've never needed or asked you to agree with me. I'm just befuddled that we've spent two pages debating whether the old system cost the student athletes. It's surreal, actually.
The "amateurism as a definitive part of the business model" was the NCAA's argument to the SCOTUS, who laughed them off in one of the court opinions. Basically, the SCOTUS told them not to come back with that stupid ****. They get no exclusion. If they want one, go get the legislators to do exactly what you proposed, and give them one.
But again... The old system was at the expense of the athletes. That is undeniable. That was the statement you took issue with. That's what's been debated, as far as I'm concern. I don't care to try anymore to convince you of the obvious.
Take care and I hope you have an excellent day, amigo. Peace.
Area | PFF Grade | FBS Rank (Out of 134 teams) | Power Four Rank (Out of 68 teams) |
Passing | 62.1 | 105th | 60th |
Rushing | 65.5 | 125th | 68th |
Receiving | 58.3 | 121st | 66th |
Pass-Blocking | 61.3 | 102nd | 57th |
Run-Blocking | 54.0 | 116th | 64th |
That's not the SA's claim. Like I said, the universities can offer amateur intramural sports. The SAs are in court pointing out that dozens of businesses are making huge profits while colluding to cut the athletes out of a fair market that could offer them a share for their work. Again... No one is saying that colleges HAVE to pay athletes to play--just that it's illegal to collude to prevent it.It’s only undeniable in comparison to an alternate universe in which they can walk into court and accuse the universities of behaving illegally for offering non-compensated athletic teams as an extracurricular activity.
By any other measure, the “old system” was amazing for the athletes. As Teddy Lehman said, an opportunity these guys dreamed of their whole lives.
By the looks of the pic, he's from further away than that. And hairier than @Weezer too.Glitch is Haitian?
Yes, I understand that nuance. My point remains the same.That's not the SA's claim. Like I said, the universities can offer amateur intramural sports. The SAs are in court pointing out that dozens of businesses are making huge profits while colluding to cut the athletes out of a fair market that could offer them a share for their work. Again... No one is saying that colleges HAVE to pay athletes to play--just that it's illegal to collude to prevent it.
Same. But I'll admit, I'm still looking for those doom-ayses that said OU would beat UT because if Heupel was any good he's be OU's coach.All I i know is I need to somehow clear out my Youtube feed from giving me Okie videos after all the game previews I watched.. We kicked their ass and moving on.
I-40 was shut down in 2009 due to a rockslide on the night of my wedding.traveled that many a times when I lived in NC. That is a huge commerce issue.
Out of the blue (no pun intended) my daughter asked if we could go to a Tennessee game at Neyland! She goes to TCU.One of my bros found KY tickets at a somewhat decent price (all things considered these days) and you get dark mode and Spooky Rocky Top, and maybe Boo scores a touchdown.