Orange.
Pocket presents 🍊
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2021
- Messages
- 23,214
- Likes
- 142,830
I can't tell if Dinich really is the committee mouthpiece, which would mean the committee is violating it's own policy of silence. Or if she is constantly claiming "the committee thinks this," and "the committee is concerned about that" without the committee speaking, which means that ESPN is being dishonest, or that she is conning ESPN, too. And ESPN is selling her columns on an extra subscriber fee only basis. That makes them money and perhaps creates the impression among some people that they are buying illicit secret info. Maybe she asks leading questions that align with her rooting interest and gets vague off-the-record replies that she spins the way she wants.The whole thing is really kinda weird imo. She's prolly a nice enough person.No, Heather Dinich is closer to being the Committees mouthpiece. Elliott is just a blowhard.
Last edited: