The whole playoff era in terms of selecting teams has been hogwash (tcu/baylor, osu/psu, fla st/bama etc..). There is a soft shell criteria they are supposed to use, but they dont. Every week there’s a new criteria/rationale they use to justify the weekly rankings. The newest rationale appears to frequently debunk the rationale they used the previous week. Its a mess. Hell, we currently have 1 active AD on the committee, which screams bias and corruption. Especially when that program was caught for spygate.
We need strict, concise, and transparent criterias for selecting the “best” teams (like each conference uses for tiebreakers). We also need committee members who aren’t currently employed to any d-1 cfb program. We should also have access to the same computer “metrics” the committee uses, so we can understand their “logic”.