lilesrt
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2009
- Messages
- 8,898
- Likes
- 10,674
View attachment 699170
Also....
View attachment 699173
*I do think it's money based, but leaving the VOL fanbase out of anything is a huge mistake. Our games are usually in the top 5-10 of games watched weekly and our fan base travels everywhere.
We were #6 in Nielsen Ratings last year and it wasn’t even a good year. We were over Oregon, Penn State, Texas and Notre Dame. We get viewers.Tennessee is not a huge draw nationwide like Alabama and Texas are. We have a very loyal and rabid fanbase that spends ridiculous time and money but that doesn't translate outside the South really. Teams like Michigan, Ohio St, Penn State, Oregon, USCsr, have big followings throughout the country. That includes the South because half of their population has moved here. That translates into tv ratings.
Even back in '98 the there were tv people who were unhappy that Tennessee was in the BCS championship game because they thought interest in the game would be less aka tv ratings. They would have much prefered FSU vs OSU. And the money is far bigger now,
I think a lot of people on here are taking the CFP at face value. Use logic and reason to pick the best teams to play for a national title. It should be easy. It should be simple. It is very easy to get locked in that argument. Especially if you love the sport and want to talk about the things that actually matter.
Unfortunately, the committee does not care about results, they do not care about ranking the best teams.
They are putting a TV product together. The same way that you would build a mini-series or movie trilogy that would be aired nationally.
They are not beholden to what happens on the field. They are analyzing spreadsheets and reports that have laid out for them what the most successful series of games would be for them to maximize revenue today, and to help in future media negotiations. That is it.
They are working backwards to find ways to slot the most desirable teams in the most advantageous spots, to produce the biggest numbers. The CFP is a TV product. The rankings show is a TV product.
You can tell that they don't give a crap because they have a few mouth pieces out there that float their BS. As others have pointed out, Dinich seems to have an in to soft release the rankings every week. Auerbach is the least skillful at veiling that she is a mouthpiece, but may be one of the loudest.
Floating things like this out there:
Attempting to normalize "taking head to head out of it." That is insight into what the committee is putting in front of media members to permeate the CFP public.
The rest get caught up in an idea that was floated out there, that really means nothing. "Best vs Most Deserving." It's a load of crap. It means nothing. They made that argument up to have talking points for TV and keep the majority of fans busy arguing about hypotheticals and pointing to data and ideas that mean absolutely nothing to the committee.
This is a TV product.
They have their A-List programs that people will always tune in for. They have sexy teams that are lightning rods. They have a pool of others to choose from. They'll continue mathing out what will be best for the executives at the very top, and tell everyone else to figure it out. Like they always do.
We rated higher than Texas on Nielsen ratings last year though. But the conversation is more about us and other “bubble” SEC teams vs the BIG 10 people they got up there. The only one ranked higher than us that had a higher Nielsen Rating last year was OSU. We were rated higher than Penn State and Oregon and for damn sure over Indiana and this was for nationwide viewership.Tennessee is not a huge draw nationwide like Alabama and Texas are. We have a very loyal and rabid fanbase that spends ridiculous time and money but that doesn't translate outside the South really. Teams like Michigan, Ohio St, Penn State, Oregon, USCsr, have big followings throughout the country. That includes the South because half of their population has moved here. That translates into tv ratings.
Even back in '98 the there were tv people who were unhappy that Tennessee was in the BCS championship game because they thought interest in the game would be less aka tv ratings. They would have much prefered FSU vs OSU. And the money is far bigger now,
Based on what?
The committee members are unlike AP members, they aren't media folks.
They aren't with any media companies.
There's no tie-in to the end TV product.
Otherwise Indiana, Boise, BYU, Ole Miss, SMU would be non-existent. Hell, you'd have us, TAMU, Clemson much higher if ratings mattered.
The committee members are not with networks. They are the voters that decide.The CFP isn't carried on major networks? The CFP rankings show isn't carried on a major network?
I don't have room to talk given I love the NBA but not the NFL so much. Kinda just lost interest in it around 7 years ago and never renewed an interest. Now that I think about it, that's about how long the Panthers have been roaming in the wilderness so......Some people don't like watching the greatest athletes in the world
Guess the same folks love high school and middle school sports. They're so much more "pure" after all. Hell, they're probably at the intramural UT games all week...
There are not 25 teams deserving of playing for the national championship.This is how the playoffs SHOULD be. Make being in the “Top 25” important, give it some significance. Give every top team a chance to play for the championship.
GIVE SOME MEANING TO THE TOP 25 because right now it needs to be called “Top 8” because the other 17 teams don’t matter.
View attachment 699195