mr.checkerboards
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2010
- Messages
- 57,415
- Likes
- 97,540
They wouldn't beat UK. I'm not sure they'd beat Ms St.Good grief Indiana has the softest schedule
They only play 1 (osu) of the top 8 b10 teams (7 if you exclude themselves)...
They play 8 of the bottom 10 b10 teams...
Their 3 OOC games...
FIU -- #112
Charlotte -- #120
Western Illinois (FCS)
Judging off them barely being able to beat Michigan, they would be 5-5 with our schedule w/ losses to Bama, Georgia, Florida, Oklahoma, & Arkansas
You can try to spin it however you want but the fact remains..... the Boston Celtics have a better history than the Minneapolis/Los Angeles Lakers. They are the greatest NBA franchise, ever.Lol...the NBA's 'original 11' is such an arbitrary take
The NBA picked the BAA's history instead of the NBL (or both) despite the NBA forming as a result of the merger of NBL-BAA.
NBL started in 1935 (Midwest Basketball Conference - renamed NBL in '37) by basketball diehards
BAA started in 1946 by owners of arenas in big cities.
The Lakers (Kings & Pistons also) moved from NBL to BAA in '48, a year before the merger in '49.
3 teams remain from the BAA (Celtics, Warriors, Knicks)
5 teams remain from the NBL (Lakers, Pistons, Kings, Hawks, 76ers)
Are any of those teams really 'expansion teams'....that didn't start until the first wave in the 60s, late 80s, mid 90s,
To each their own.
But no Arky isn't good.
Too bad the Lakers have the new Larry Bird.You can try to spin it however you want but the fact remains..... the Boston Celtics have a better history than the Minneapolis/Los Angeles Lakers. They are the greatest NBA franchise, ever.
View attachment 699267