screenthis
“No matter where you go. . .there you are!”
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2012
- Messages
- 3,032
- Likes
- 9,914
Im not against the hire, just saying I wasn’t overly excited about it. I guess I don’t know what exactly an analyst does. If he’s in charge of helping decipher offensive schemes, then why not get someone with more of a resume and less someone the HC knows personally? Again, not hating on the hire, just not saying “wow, I can’t believe we got Landry freaking Jones to come help with the offense!”It’s an ANALYST. He has name recognition and may relate to recruits. Maybe he won’t be exciting…what’s the risk?
Busy work and individual drills. Also contacting recruits. Sometimes I don’t even know all the names from year to year. How many knew Coach Chop before last year? I had to look him up on UTSports three years ago when I kept seeing recruits reference him in their Tweets.Im not against the hire, just saying I wasn’t overly excited about it. I guess I don’t know what exactly an analyst does. If he’s in charge of helping decipher offensive schemes, then why not get someone with more of a resume and less someone the HC knows personally? Again, not hating on the hire, just not saying “wow, I can’t believe we got Landry freaking Jones to come help with the offense!”
And who's fault is that? Nico is his dude. He's had him here for two years. Look, I don't know what's wrong with the offense. It's a shell of its former self. Just like the defense, it's very simplistic. Very little motion. Very little creativity. Very little deception. It seems to be even less than last year with Milton. I've said it multiple times, I'm not one of those that believe the offense left with Golesh. Something is up. I don't know why it's morphed into what it is.
I agree but the offensive scheme gave no help. Little to no motion. Very little ingenuity. Made it easy on the defense.I think it morphed out of necessity. We ran wide open offense as much as we could against creampuffs scoring 60 points per game. When we got into SEC play our Oline and WRs got exposed...our starting Tackles got manhandled and run around all game. Coach got pizzed and put in the backups if you remember and we went sack, sack, sack on 3 consecutive downs (Nico might have managed to throw the ball away on 2nd down? Same result tho in Nico on his back) The WRs like Nimrod were dropping wide open TDs and when they didnt Nico overthrew them. The Arkansas game was UGLY. CJH realized he didnt have the personnel necessary to run the Spread much aggressively so he adapted. Used the Spread formation still to keep defenses stretched thin, but ran the ball more than we ever have because this Oline was much better at run blocking than pass blocking...and the WRs sucked all year if we are being honest. This was the least exciting offense this year since CJH has been here. It was probably his best coaching job though and showed me that he is able to adapt to his personnel and try to mask weaknesses, rather than being too proud and still trying to make a square peg fit in a round hole. Now lets see what Coach does about it. Lets see what the Oline and WRs look like in 2025. Theres gonna be growing pains because we will be young at WR and at spots on the Oline (Satterwhite, Sanders) but if the Oline and WRs arent better next year CJH is gonna have to make a move with Pope and maybe Ellarbee too. 2026 should mean a playoff run and shot at winning it all. Everything that happens between here and there will affect that run. I am excited to see how we attack that opportunity. GO VOLS
Agree with something is up. But the changes in O started with Milton who could not execute some of it. Yet, Golesh is running it at USF. It is puzzling.And who's fault is that? Nico is his dude. He's had him here for two years. Look, I don't know what's wrong with the offense. It's a shell of its former self. Just like the defense, it's very simplistic. Very little motion. Very little creativity. Very little deception. It seems to be even less than last year with Milton. I've said it multiple times, I'm not one of those that believe the offense left with Golesh. Something is up. I don't know why it's morphed into what it is.
I’ve been to Arizona once, and I was 5 years old in 2001-02. My grandpa took road trips a lot. I begged my way on to one where he drove the entire distance of I-40. I remember bits and pieces but I want to do it again with my kid once she’s a little older so she’ll remember more of it than I did.I couldn't do the Rockies...I simply can't take the cold. If I moved out west, I would probably move somewhere in southern Arizona.
It's a purple state...but it's pretty much the desert-mountain version of Florida.
It was weird to me how much the Phoenix vibe reminds me of T-Bay.
Yes, Golesh was able to find a QB who can run the complexities of the offense but Nico can't do it in year 2? I agree, it's puzzling. I've never seen the same team/coaching staff look so different as our offense has in 23/24 vs 22.Agree with something is up. But the changes in O started with Milton who could not execute some of it. Yet, Golesh is running it at USF. It is puzzling.
I say expand to 16 teams and use the big bowl games instead of home field advantage. NO BYES---8 games, 4 games, 2 games and a championship game ---done.Bump
This year's playoff format and committee could not have been any worse. The layout with conference champions and bye weeks didn't even sound right when they extended it to 12 teams.
IMO:
Top 8 teams get in
No bye weeks
No automatic bids
Conference championship games count
SOS counts
Use a mix of computers and humans (just no sitting ADs or anyone looking to make money off the games)
Wouldn’t surprise me if Day sold his soul to the devil (some Connor Stallions type) for some espionage goodies on Tennessee and Oregon. The VOLS and Ducks aren’t slaw, and they slaughtered both of us.