Recruiting Football Talk VIII

I agree that this wasn’t a head hunting play, but the rule says any forcible contact to the head or neck of a defenseless player with the helmet, arm, fist, shoulder, etc. is targeting. It’s just true that the defender hit the WR in the head with force.

The rule requires the defender to lower the aim point. That’s how you avoid the foul. Heck, UGA had 2 guys ejected against Texas for almost identical tackles with lower aiming points and less forcible contact to the head, except the WRs both lowered their heads into contact.

The rule might need to change (I won’t defend it), but I have no idea how the call isn’t made there.
Plus the guy ESPN pays to analyze the calls, Matt Austin said point blank before the review that it was text book targeting by the current rules. I agree a lot of the targeting rules are BS but that’s not what is being debated. If that had happened to Tennessee we would have literally burned the entire world down. It was one of the worst calls I have ever seen and I could care less about either team. I definitely agree it wasn’t intentional targeting but that isn’t the rule because they deliberately wanted to remove intent from the rules because it’s impossible to determine. Oh well ASU still had every chance to win in overtime. The inconsistency is what is so frustrating and what leads fans to believe everything is rigged.
 
For an analyst job, Landry Jones is a great hire. With the Steelers for 5 seasons, playing 18 total games. Spent a season with Jaguars and Raiders and then a year with the Dallas Renegades in the XFL...which isn't a huge feather, but Bob Stoops was the HC and Hal Mumme was the OC.
I love the hire as well
 
Why didn't they make the sugar Bowl a night game? Most everyone around the country will be working still...
The coaches, from both teams, thought they would be at a disadvantage having less time to prepare for their next game. I know it's only about 4 hours but that was their belief. As it stands now, the winning team will still have less time to prepare because the game was moved back a day. Coaches really believe this stuff
 
  • Like
Reactions: jave36
I think Saquon is pretty damn happy he got 2k and this game doesn't help the Eagles at all. They're the 2 seed with no chance of being the 1 seed (Lions play Vikings and both are 14-2, winner is the 1 seed out right). But losing any more players to injury would kill the Eagles SB chances.

Also as it stands now they'll get very good GB team as the 7 seed or Washington depending on how Sunday goes (GB wins and Washington loses then it'll be Eagles hosting Washington).

The more interesting game is the Ravens...they are a 3 seed right now, losing Saturday would likely open the door for them to drop to a 5 seed if the Steelers win. So they're less likely to risk losing and dropping out of a hosting seed.

I doubt Henry gets THAT many carries, but if he breaks a few big runs he could also hit 2k this season (that would be awesome imo)
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
I think Saquon is pretty damn happy he got 2k and this game doesn't help the Eagles at all. They're the 2 seed with no chance of being the 1 seed (Lions play Vikings and both are 14-2, winner is the 1 seed out right). But losing any more players to injury would kill the Eagles SB chances.

Also as it stands now they'll get very good GB team as the 7 seed or Washington depending on how Sunday goes (GB wins and Washington loses then it'll be Eagles hosting Washington).

The more interesting game is the Ravens...they are a 3 seed right now, losing Saturday would likely open the door for them to drop to a 5 seed if the Steelers win. So they're less likely to risk losing and dropping out of a hosting seed.

I doubt Henry gets THAT many carries, but if he breaks a few big runs he could also hit 2k this season (that would be awesome imo)
What seed are the Titans?
 
If Mike Matthews stays that's terrific, if Matthews goes so be it. Some are acting like this young man is the difference between 2 wins and a National Championship. Good grief..

Key point here..he was a building piece for the future..raw potential who sat behind wr’s consistently dropping the ball…hurt or not if he felt like he was better than what was being put on the field…I gotta believe in his confidence..i wasn’t impressed with anyone outside of brazzell this year if that tells you anything and we wasted bru
 
  • Like
Reactions: JCVol00
When your scheme has posed little threat to a good defense in two years. Fresh ideas. The best ones do it. I know nothing about offensive game planning, but his OC/QB/WR/OL coaches aren’t really getting poached.
You are aware that ANALYSTS aren’t hired to enact or adjust a scheme? They’re SUPPORT for what you’re going to do anyway. This is a stepping stone for fledgling coaches in training or coaches between jobs. Don’t make it more than what it is. He made a name for himself by setting some records in college and holding a roster spot in the NFL for a minute…otherwise we’d notice less than when we first heard Mitch Militello signed on…whenever the hell that was.
 
The coaches, from both teams, thought they would be at a disadvantage having less time to prepare for their next game. I know it's only about 4 hours but that was their belief. As it stands now, the winning team will still have less time to prepare because the game was moved back a day. Coaches really believe this stuff
It's the difference of losing an entire day. Play early and you get out town that night and back home..... Start normal schedule for prep the following day. Play that night and you stay overnight get it and kiss the day to travel.

It makes sense.
 
I thought the Oregon beatdown might center some Vols fans that have been whining since we lost

yet I go on Twitter and they're still out in force

It's like they have a meltdown complex that if it isn't going perfect, it's not worth having, so burn it all down
We could win the natty 80-0, Jesus comes back, and every Vol fan survives the rapture, and we’d still have a vocal minority complaining.
 
You are aware that ANALYSTS aren’t hired to enact or adjust a scheme? They’re SUPPORT for what you’re going to do anyway. This is a stepping stone for fledgling coaches in training or coaches between jobs. Don’t make it more than what it is. He made a name for himself by setting some records in college and holding a roster spot in the NFL for a minute…otherwise we’d notice less than when we first heard Mitch Militello signed on…whenever the hell that was.

I’ll agree with some of that. Trying not to make much of it. But it’s the offseason 😜

But an analysts isn’t hired to support what you’re doing, but identify blind spots, weaknesses, inject new ideas.

Again, no idea what Landry brings to the table. But I don’t agree with you that analysts are hired to be yes men and support. Very much disagree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jave36
The coaches, from both teams, thought they would be at a disadvantage having less time to prepare for their next game. I know it's only about 4 hours but that was their belief. As it stands now, the winning team will still have less time to prepare because the game was moved back a day. Coaches really believe this stuff
Lol that 3 hours would make a difference. The fans who support this multi billion dollar industry would like to be able to watch it.
 

VN Store



Back
Top