Checker_the_Shire
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2017
- Messages
- 2,827
- Likes
- 7,197
Does he change anything in the scheme?Analysts help position coaches with their groups and some analyst help with game planning. I know one senior offensive analyst who meets with his OC before the final play call sheet is finalized and printed for offensive staff. He suggests changes and discusses trick plays and 2point plays. During games he is uses analytics to recommend strategies for 4th downs, field goals and punting.
Rogers was a faster and more talented JJ. The difference is he couldn’t keep himself in check whereas JJ managed to channel himself. But he was an absolute beast and difference maker. He would 100 percent have made a difference in this offense. Just feed him Valium when not playing.Not sure he would have made that large of an impact but he could have been a good player with the right coach. It's been a while though so I don't remember how much potential he may have had. His team and coaches were pathetic though so that didn't help. Don't recall if he had injuries or anything as well. That 2012 roster that he should have been a part of was loaded on offense. I'd love to have seen what Heupel could have done with that offense.
@JackcrevolEveryone has heard of the historical figure, Karl Marx.
But no one remembers his sister, Onya, who invented the starting pistol.
Yes. When smaller schools call to discuss his team’s offense, he does conference calls with them. He also teaches the offense to new coaches.Does he change anything in the scheme?
If a college football coach thinks fans questioning his job performance is abuse, then he probably needs to either grow thicker skin or get into a different line of work.The underlying point being that passion does not make something the right thing to do. And your definition of "abuse" and the coach's definition of "abuse" (i.e. a dumb fanbase making a coach want to leave for a lateral position, which was the context in question) may not be the same. You answered a post about public ridicule. In the discussion at hand, the coaches' definition of what constitutes 'abuse' probably trumps yours.
Fahr Heupel...he sucks...can't get it done...blah blah blah..And who's fault is that? Nico is his dude. He's had him here for two years. Look, I don't know what's wrong with the offense. It's a shell of its former self. Just like the defense, it's very simplistic. Very little motion. Very little creativity. Very little deception. It seems to be even less than last year with Milton. I've said it multiple times, I'm not one of those that believe the offense left with Golesh. Something is up. I don't know why it's morphed into what it is.
Let me be the first to say, I hereby redact my comments about Him not caring. I have absolutely no idea if He cares who wins or loses. What you're saying makes absolute sense. Love him or hate him, Tim Tebow mentions Christ at every turn. I absolutely agree that God would use anyone to further His love in Christ Jesus.I'd say that if the outcome of a game/career was useful to his ultimate plan, He'd care. Romans 8 says that He'll work ALL thing out for the good of those who love Him and are called according to His purposes. I'd say He has the freedom and interest to use any and all conceivable circumstances to do so.
If an easy, successful football career with lots of income would be good for His calling on someone's life, He may help that along. Or conversely, if all that would inhibit their good, His glory, and His plan, he may choose not to bless it. He's the heavenly FATHER to some of us. He's better at it than I have been a father, and even I put my fingers on the scales when it came to my kids, either encouraging or discouraging, depending on how it would either benefit or hurt them and their development.
Who was it? I think I heard a testimony from... was it Crompton? That he was humbled to the point of salvation due to his QB struggles. (I may have the wrong name there, but it was through the team chaplain, whomever it was.)
MM should've been playing from game 1. If he wasn't ready, that's on Pope. If he wasn't ready game 1, he should've been good to go by mid-season.AP saying MM more upset with playing time than money… why we trotted out Nimrod/Webb all season is beyond me. MM was at least as good and 3 years younger.
So why is he leaving? He has tons of it available as a true sophomore next year. Plus, he’s not guaranteed playing time at any other big-time program that’s a playoff contender.AP saying MM more upset with playing time than money… why we trotted out Nimrod/Webb all season is beyond me. MM was at least as good and 3 years younger.
Again, the underlying point being that just because something is done commonly, and passionately, doesn't make it productive.If a college football coach thinks fans questioning his job performance is abuse, then he probably needs to either grow thicker skin or get into a different line of work.
Anyhow, as much as I like a good free expression vs snowflakes debate, I believe I’ll sit this one out.
This dumbWhat I don’t get is one of the “insiders” said heupel has evolved into an impressive HC. If this is what some call impressive then I’m even more confused by it than I was. This is not impressive, this is unimaginative and boring
Probably doesn’t believe he will be managed properly now. Probably was performing at least as good as the other WR in practice even with freshman mistakes. There is no excuse for him not getting more meaningful ptSo why is he leaving? He has tons of it available as a true sophomore next year. Plus, he’s not guaranteed playing time at any other big-time program that’s a playoff contender.