Jackcrevol
Ain't Got Time!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2005
- Messages
- 70,256
- Likes
- 178,303
I'm fine with that I'm a basic sense. But then they would also have to pay the men. A basic pay for play.They aren’t trying to force NIL Payments, from a 3rd party, to the girls.
They are trying to force Revenue Sharing, from the Schools, to the girls.
First word is best.
I don't know why we go out of our way to run off people with some connection who are willing to give info not fed through established mouthpieces.
As always you have to take it with a grain of salt. But people willing to give you a little extra behind the scenes, giving you info in complex scenarios can be wrong even when they are doing everything right. And we dump on them because it's not what we want to hear or things didn't break the way we wanted.
Others just want to argue.
It flies in the face of the logic that says athletes have a right to share in the revenues they help produceThe idea of rev sharing evenly with one sport that brings in 100 million and the other sport loses 2-5 million a year and gets bailed out by the 100 million a year sport is interesting to say the least