Recruiting Football Talk VIII

#119,482
#119,482
SpringBokVol said:
The idea of rev sharing evenly with one sport that brings in 100 million and the other sport loses 2-5 million a year and gets bailed out by the 100 million a year sport is interesting to say the least
Click to expand...
It flies in the face of the logic that says athletes have a right to share in the revenues they help produce
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN-POSSUM, Orange., LaagerVol and 2 others
#119,489
#119,489
KB5252 said:
First word is best.

I don't know why we go out of our way to run off people with some connection who are willing to give info not fed through established mouthpieces.

As always you have to take it with a grain of salt. But people willing to give you a little extra behind the scenes, giving you info in complex scenarios can be wrong even when they are doing everything right. And we dump on them because it's not what we want to hear or things didn't break the way we wanted.

Others just want to argue.
Click to expand...
I think it is a defense mechanism.
 
#119,492
#119,492
SpringBokVol said:
The idea of rev sharing evenly with one sport that brings in 100 million and the other sport loses 2-5 million a year and gets bailed out by the 100 million a year sport is interesting to say the least
Click to expand...
Money-losing sports really need to get their biggest boosters activated. The players in those $-2 to -5 million sports are each going to owe the university a lot of money. Negative revenue “they helped produce.”
 
Last edited:
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top