JAllen18
VFL
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2006
- Messages
- 6,676
- Likes
- 14,244
Only real disagreement with that projection is Gooden starting at nose. See Emerson beginning those games and only getting better. Gooden might be more depth at DT with Garland and Simmons logging minutes at fire plug.
Not enough on Velus Jones for me to agree or disagree...at least comparing him to Brandon Johnson. Neither are proven commodities in any aspect. Johnson had stats in a lost season...somebody had to.Yeah, hard to come back from an injury that takes an entire year away and with missing spring I don't know that Gooden starts unless someone is hurt.
I also don't know if I agree with their starting WRs. I think Palmer is pretty obvious, but I'm not sure Velus is going to just show up and beat out Brandon Johnson to start. Velus had just 36 catches in his career at USC, I see him more of the KR/PR specialist to replace Calloway with some experience rather than relying on someone else.
Not enough on Velus Jones for me to agree or disagree...at least comparing him to Brandon Johnson. Neither are proven commodities in any aspect. Johnson had stats in a lost season...somebody had to.
I also don't know if I agree with their starting WRs. I think Palmer is pretty obvious, but I'm not sure Velus is going to just show up and beat out Brandon Johnson to start. Velus had just 36 catches in his career at USC, I see him more of the KR/PR specialist to replace Calloway with some experience rather than relying on someone else.
I thought the same of Garland. He improved ALOT last yr.Only KNOWN quantity back then. Closest thing to a NT on the roster the previous season. Of course that was with Emerson recovering from a devastating high school injury. Facts changed last season. Emerson isn’t some emergency standby...he outperformed Gooden comparing their two seasons and Garland wasn’t far off. Could see Gooden get NFL consideration at DT...even backing up Solomon.