Ron Swanson
Offense Wins Championships.
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2012
- Messages
- 38,246
- Likes
- 198,049
I mean he is 2-1 against the SEC. His only loss was a close game vs Lsu. An LSU team that is probably one of the 3 best teams in SEC history... They blew out literally everyone except auburn, Bama and Texas.Just curious what makes you think "Texas can be so difficult" while you "can see him improving here?"
You think Texas is harder than TN? In schedule? In fan/booster support/expectation? What?
A rule of thumb would be: if you can't excel in a lesser conference, you likely won't even in a harder conference. Is that not logical?
How is that familiar? His losses to inadequate competition were close games whereas ours we got blown out...Do you guys even attempt to form a sound argument?
Coaching failure.Buddy close games are close games basically means those games could have went the other way they just didn’t so hell yes I would trade that for 3-7 and blowout losses what are we arguing about here?
Lol explain Pruitt because your idea of coaching failure is not the same as Fulmer’sCoaching failure.
Tom Herman isn't that good at winning with good recruiting classes vs his peers with lesser recruiting classes in the B12.
What makes you think he'll do better in the SEC against better coaches?
Coaching failure.
Did he beat Georgia?At worse his talent was equal to OU.
Nobody else in the Big 12 is remotely close.
He lost 7 conference games in the last 2 years with one of the best 2 rosters in his conference.
For a similar comparison, it would be like UGA or Bama losing 7 games in 2 years in the SEC with their talent.
Where the comparison changes is the fact it would be a lot easier to lose 7 games in the SEC by comparison to the Big 12.
The idea isn't whether he's better than Pruitt. The idea is whether he is the guy to move UT back in the top tier with Bama, UGA, LSU, UF and now A&M. There's nothing pointing to the idea that he would.
Again, I'm not defending Pruitt. Pruitt sucks and is not the guy.Lol explain Pruitt because your idea of coaching failure is not the same as Fulmer’s
I think this is a reasonable point of view. But Herman won a lot there. We would be pretty pumped in comparison if he had the same record here. And it's feasible. He would have us competing with Florida/UGA. Better coaching record than anybody else in the east. No reason he couldn't build us back to a 7-8 win floor every year. Once we get back there anything can happen.
He also would have a chance to start fresh and change his approach after escaping a possibly toxic environment. Now would he be entering another toxic one here? Maybe. But he also might better know how to get ahead of those problems the second time around. Better to have the experience than thrusting our toxicity on a first time head coach.
This is the type of risk I think we are in the perfect position to take on personally.
He is a great coach. His losses are all by small digits and his teams play hard. He wins a lot more than he loses. I don’t know what you are reading or why you are trying to harp that he isn’t a good coach. He is a good coach and he would do well here.Again, I'm not defending Pruitt. Pruitt sucks and is not the guy.
We're talking Tom Herman. He's out of a job at TX BECAUSE he's a good recruiter and a poor coach. The similarlity of what's happened at TX over the Herman years is much like TN....... really good recruiting classes for several years and results that don't match the recruiting. That's on the coaches.
Tom Herman is, at best, a lateral move for UT.