Recruiting Forum Football Talk III

Status
Not open for further replies.
Even if the entire outlook was different and we went 7-3 And we were begging to keep him... it still wouldn’t be over.

What else do you need to see to believe it’s over? Just waiting until early next week to call it so they have time to submit their report in full?


Edit: just saw where you answered this basically, saying the investigation isn’t over
 
  • Like
Reactions: HankHill
I say it’s over Bc i think the findings will leave UT no choice but to start over like i believe it’s over for him. The actual investigation is not over.

Hank you are one of my favorite posters but admit it. You said vq had the info yesterday that is was over

100% you said


That may be the end result but you are saying differently than that today
 
Hank you are one of my favorite posters but admit it. You said vq had the info yesterday that is was over

100% you said


That may be the end result but you are saying differently than that today

Over for Pruitt.... not the actuall investigation. I said i got wind that VQ staffer has told people it’s over for Pruitt. I stand by that. Which is why i said i put the odds of him being fired 100/0.
 
Ok. Possible
Like i said. Idc if I’m right or wrong. I throw you guys info that i still occasionally get. I don’t triple fact check it. Lol Sometimes it’s right (investigation starting, strength coach) sometimes it’s wrong. But some of the same guys i heard those others from think this thing will turn out big time bad for Pruitt and co. Specifically Neids.
 
Last edited:
Like i said. Idc if I’m right or wrong. I throw you guys info that i still occasionally get. I don’t triple fact check it. Lol Sometimes it’s right (investigation starting, strength coach) sometimes it’s wrong. But some of the same guys i heard those others from think this thing will be turn out big time bad for Pruitt and co. Specifically Neids.
Neids will need a new profession . Pruitt is responsible for him.
 
Over for Pruitt.... not the actuall investigation. I said i got wind that VQ staffer has told people it’s over for Pruitt. I stand by that. Which is why i said i put the odds of him being fired 100/0.
I wish they would come out and say it, then. It isn't helping our program at all to be in this limbo.
 
I wish they would come out and say it, then. It isn't helping our program at all to be in this limbo.
I don’t think they can either way. Like i said you have to carry on like it’s business as usuall just like Florida did with Mullen. Their findings weren’t enough to be grounds for termination.
 
Right. It’s like people were expecting Pruitt to be fired right after his formal interview... that was never going to happen. All the findings, testimonies, etc have to be compiled together in ways to Present to UT, from there compliance/Admin will decide how severe the findings are and what the best course of action is before submitting them to SEC/NCAA. Then whatever action we decide to carry out whether that be totally cleaning house, firing assistants, or whatever it may be..... hopefully SEC/NCAA determines the punishment fits the crime or only a little further punishment will be needed.

UT cannot stop Pruitt from carrying out daily activities aka doing his job or he would have grounds for a wrongful termination defense. That’s why , imo, nothing that UT, Pruitt, assistants etc do in the mean time actually means anything.
I don't understand why this is not understood. It's as if we have people falling into 2 camps.
1. Opinion: if he were going to be fired, he would be fired by now.
2. Opinion: there is no way he can continue to be the coach after the way this has gone.
 
Imo if Pruitt left that meeting Thursday night and Fulmer was extremely confident he was going to survive Fulmer himself would have been on the trip to see Henry T
Asking because I honestly don’t know. Thinking that would be a NCAA violation for a AD visiting a players home right? Maybe not, I just don’t think that would sound ok.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VOLSONLY
Asking because I honestly don’t know. Thinking that would be a NCAA violation for a AD visiting a players home right? Maybe not, I just don’t think that would sound ok.
I don’t think it would be since he a is currently enrolled. If he was actually in the portal then i would assume the same recruiting rules would apply..... the only way the AD or anyone could do an inhome would be if they are cleared to do so.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top