Weird logic. I'd prefer if, after looking at all the candidates, we got our first choice. And if that's Elliott that means they found him more impressive than all the more experienced options. Experience reduces risk but doesn't always predict which candidate has the best shot at success. We may get a postseason ban for a year or two anyway so I say go for the most upside. If DW thinks that's Campbell, I'm all in. If he thinks it's Elliot I hope he doesn't pass on him just because of lack of experience. DW said he wants to be aggressive. People assume that means throwing money at big names. It could also mean taking a shot at the highest upside and not being afraid to fail. Jmo