Ryno14
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2018
- Messages
- 991
- Likes
- 8,574
Can anyone talk me through the transfer takes recently?
I'm particularly curious if anyone can discern a rationale for taking anything other LBs after the exodus that just occurred. Maybe guys are going to move from the line to LB? or from DB to LB? I don't know. And I definitely assume that the coaches who see the players every day and know the scheme they're trying to install know what they're doing. But, it's just curious to me that we didn't just take a half dozen LBs as transfers.
Anyone follow the logic and can show me how this works out?
Good post, doc.
I have never understood why people always want to follow somebody else's path to success instead of taking their own. That is clearly what happened with not just the Gump, but also with Botch. Both were poor imitations of the guy that helped them get the job (Saban/Kelly) who had blazed their own paths to success. In both cases UT's "leadership" chose imitator/wannabes. That stuff happens across the spectrum in sports and all other aspects of society. We have seen it play out with the LV program. Yeah, let's select deputy Holly to run it into the ground because Pat wants her. Uh, even a legend like Pat should not have the right to dictate the path of the program because she was not exactly setting the woods on fire before her diagnosis. The game had moved on from her method of play. So should have the program. Dools was just a SEC blue blood buddy deal panic hire. A total whiff.
You might take a hit for a time with team performance as the system changes and roster is rebuilt, but in the long run it is worth it. Fulmer and his system was done. It was the decision making after it that was screwed up. In Gumpland - when Bear was done, Stallings briefly raised it up, then Saban took it to new heights. In between was pain. You just try to make the period in between as short as possible. That is where UT leadership failed. They never learned to quit compounding the problem. We go barren wasteland until new growth starts slowly building. Just look at the history of the program.
Hire the very best like Bama did, or, hire the very best innovator at the time who has been successful in previous stops like UF did with Meyer.
IMO UT finally did the later with Heup.
I think Pruitt lacked the intelligence to develop his own style. When I got into coaching I had a number of mentors and tried to take a little something good from each of them. Love him or hate him for his UGA ties but Erk Russell was one of the best for me, mostly due to his humility. The best ones, besides being good at their job, had very little ego and didn't expect you to become a mini me. I'm not sure Saban falls in this category and I feel like Pruitt lacked the intelligence to be anything more than a fanboy.
Can anyone talk me through the transfer takes recently?
I'm particularly curious if anyone can discern a rationale for taking anything other LBs after the exodus that just occurred. Maybe guys are going to move from the line to LB? or from DB to LB? I don't know. And I definitely assume that the coaches who see the players every day and know the scheme they're trying to install know what they're doing. But, it's just curious to me that we didn't just take a half dozen LBs as transfers.
Anyone follow the logic and can show me how this works out?
I think he wanted to go to Bama all along. His dad basically confirmed it in that interview he did a couple months ago.What rumor mill? I’ve been told Bama all along.
I believe it’s all those younger guys coming along and playing hard....the Herd Line for example.
Tanner Jeannot is playing better hockey than someone like Kyle Turris almost ever did as a Predator.
Line of scrimmage on both sides looks like it could be a strength. I good mix of talent and experience, which can go a long way in the SEC.With all of the recent transfers in, what does our two deep look like? Here is my crack at it...corner and inside backer seem like they biggest concerns for depth. None of it matters if we can't find the guy for the QB position though. Certainly not a complete roster, but looks to be a roster that can be bowl eligible if we find a leader at QB.
QB
- Milton OR Bailey OR Hooker
RB
- Small
- Evans
WR1
- Hyatt
- Tillman
WR2
- V. Jones
- Coby
Slot
- Payton
- Calloway
TE
- Fant
- Pope
LT
- Davis
- Calbert
LG
- Carvin
- Spraggins
C
- Cooper Mays
- Carvin
RG
- Cade Mays
- Spraggins
RT
- Wright
- Calbert
DT
- Middleton (If he is still here)
- Butler
- Terry
NT
- Solomon
- Simmons
DE
- Bumphus
- Emerson
- Tremblay
OLB
- Baron
- Harrison
- Eason
OLB
- Young
- Joseph
ILB
- Banks
- Garland
ILB
- Mitchell
- Willis
CB1
- Taylor
- George
CB2
- Burrell
- Fields
Nickel
- T. Jackson
- Slaughter
Safety
- McCullough
- McDonald
Safety
- Flowers
- Charles