USC sits smack dab in the middle of at least one of the top 5 most talent rich areas in the country, and any other program within a 12 hour drive basically has to settle for the players they don’t want.
You just said it yourself that USC upgraded at AD. Florida has fired its last 2 coaches one year removed from winning the SEC East, and that program seems to have slipped into a little bit of dysfunction (and I’m here for it). LSU may have a slight edge as far as admin is concerned, maybe. But has the new USC admin even been around long enough to say for sure?
LSU is in the toughest division of the toughest conference in all of college football. Oregon is literally the only team in USC’s conference that should even give them a run year in and year out.
For all these reasons, I still say USC is the better job.
Good points, and you aren't wrong, but Florida and LSU are still better jobs.
Regarding recruiting - LSU and Florida have just as much access to elite recruits. You could even argue that LSU has greater access to recruits because they are THE program in the state of Louisiana, which is a football talent hotbed.
USC upgraded at AD, sure. But a scarecrow wearing a USC polo would be an upgrade from Lynn Swann.
What has changed since USC was last elite in football? Los Angeles has two pro football teams now. USC is no longer the big show. In Los Angeles you are competing with the Rams, the Chargers, the Lakers, Angels, Dodgers, UCLA, the beach, major city entertainment and attractions.
I think the argument could be made to put USC in the same tier as Florida (probably with Texas too). But that tier is squarely underneath Alabama, Ohio State, Georgia, and LSU.
Three different coaches have won a championship at LSU in the past 2 decades. This proves that everything is in place to win there.