mr.checkerboards
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2010
- Messages
- 59,182
- Likes
- 99,284
Good thoughts. In particular on Chuck Webb. The '90 and '91 teams were pretty good. They'd have been national title contenders with Webb for sure.
A few nits:
Fulmer was the coach starting in '93 so Shuler staying or Colquitt not getting injured in '94 wouldn't have impacted Majors time at Tennessee. I can't remember the ins and outs of Manning's recruitment though so I'm not sure if Shuler staying would have impacted him coming to Tennessee or not. I don't think we get an extra year from Manning though even if he redshirted in '94.
That 2001 Miami team was loaded. We had a lot of firepower but I just can't imagine hanging with them. Especially given how crappy our coaching was in the SEC championship that year.
I don't know. There's something disarming about watching a grown adult bark at you. It's like trying to get mad at someone who walks around in public with a helmet on. More sympathy than anger.UGA literally are the only fans that I about get in a fight with EVERYTIME I attend the game, I mean Bama, UF, and all them are annoying but nothings worse than d*mn georgia idiots
This is a line of scrimmage league if you want to win championships. I love our offense but we have to learn how to play power ball in short yard situations and around the goal line. We have got to have the ability to slow down at times and get the tough yards when needed. Offense is important but at the end of the day you have to be able to play great defense in this league too. You got to be able to run and pass effectively and on D you got to be able to get pressure on quarterback. You have to be solid at it all. That is not changing. GBO
I was assuming, maybe erroneously, that if Majors wins the '90 NC he would have survived the health scare and anything Fulmer did as interim. I was assuming Fulmer went elsewhere after his interim gig in '93 and Majors resumed the reigns. So my comment on Manning was based on Majors being the coach instead of Fulmer and the differences in their recruiting philosophies. But to your point, who knows what would have happened...
Alright, you guys that said UGA winning would be the worst thing ever are right.
2 days in and their fans are just getting started, but they're already the worst.
No kind of offense works in short yardage if you can’t block them when they know it’s coming.
1000000% agree. Very evident when you watch the games. The NC game really showcased the Line of scrimmage. We’ve got to get bigger, alot bigger and faster in that area on both fronts. Our players god bless them but they look nothing like what Georgia and Bammer have up front. Georgia and Bammer have mutant freaks chasing the quarterback and blockingThis is a line of scrimmage league if you want to win championships. I love our offense but we have to learn how to play power ball in short yard situations and around the goal line. We have got to have the ability to slow down at times and get the tough yards when needed. Offense is important but at the end of the day you have to be able to play great defense in this league too. You got to be able to run and pass effectively and on D you got to be able to get pressure on quarterback. You have to be solid at it all. That is not changing. GBO
Yes
That team with jB, AS and GW would’ve a been even better imo
Bc they would’ve run a ton
1000000% agree. Very evident when you watch the games. The NC game really showcased the Line of scrimmage. We’ve got to get bigger, alot bigger and and faster in that area on both fronts. Our players god bless them but they look nothing like what Georgia and Bammer have up front. Georgia and Bammer have mutant freaks chasing the quarterback and blocking
Strong list.What if Chuck Webb never gets hurt?
What if Fulmer takes the Arkansas job?
What if Heath Shuler stays for his Sr. season? ((Manning redshirts?)
What if Jerry Colquitt never gets hurt?
What if Tennessee blocks Alex Brown in 1999?
What if Rohan Davey doesn't get hurt in 2001?
What if UT holds off LSU in the 2007 SEC title game? (Does that give Fulmer more time?)
What if...UT hires a different coach going all the way back to the hiring of Dave Clawson over Mike DeBord? Gary Patterson or Brian Kelly instead of Kiffin? Kippy Brown as an interim over Dooley? Charlie Strong instead of Butch? Mike Leach over Pruitt? (I'd say it's too soon to say someone over Heupel)
What if Rod Wilks was given his choice of starting positions the moment he stepped foot on campus?
What if Gerald Williams got into UT the first time?
This is fun. I hope some other answers come in.
That’s true certainly. I don’t really think Heupel had a short yardage playbook problem. I believe it was more players than anything. Too many runs got no yardage our quarterback was sacked and pressured the most in the Conference as well. Only thing I’d say about the short yardage with Heupel is I kinda wish he wouldn’t hurry up and snap it at times on 4th. Opposing linebackers fly down everytime and clog the gaps for a loss. Until we get more talent up front on OL it might be a good idea to slow down the tempo on 4th at times. The DL was pretty decent overall. Pass rush was awful though. Coaches did a great job at using what they had available that’s for sureFacts. I still think when RG has his line talent and development clicking at the level he typically does the defense will be a ton better. When you got a DL full of NFL guys that are strong and fast and can generate pressure on their own everything else gets a lot easier. Running QBs are now facing LBs that aren't trying to beat blocks to make plays. WRs are suddenly stuck with a DB that doesn't have to hold coverage for 5+ seconds every play and has more juice to break on the ball when it is thrown. And RBs don't have wide open holes to get to the second level.
Very true.This is a line of scrimmage league if you want to win championships. I love our offense but we have to learn how to play power ball in short yard situations and around the goal line. We have got to have the ability to slow down at times and get the tough yards when needed. Offense is important but at the end of the day you have to be able to play great defense in this league too. You got to be able to run and pass effectively and on D you got to be able to get pressure on quarterback. You have to be solid at it all. That is not changing. GBO
That’s true certainly. I don’t really think Heupel had a short yardage playbook problem. I believe it was more players than anything. Too many runs got no yardage our quarterback was sacked and pressured the most in the Conference as well. Only thing I’d say about the short yardage with Heupel is I kinda wish he wouldn’t hurry up and snap it at times on 4th. Opposing linebackers fly down everytime and clog the gaps for a loss. Until we get more talent up front on OL it might be a good idea to slow down the tempo on 4th at times. The DL was pretty decent overall. Pass rush was awful though. Coaches did a great job at using what they had available that’s for sure