Recruiting Forum Football Talk IV

[Orange_Crush]

So, non-employees of a university who participate in a collective are arms of the university. lol.

I've got an arm for them.

That will float as well as a lead brick.

I would be amazed if the NCAA would take the chance of being pulled back in front of the SC on these issues. It'll be a very bad look when they're trying to say who can't pay athletes for Nanem/Image/Likeness.

The first sanction by the NCAA, if I'm a uni, I take them straight to court.

 

[SamRebel35]

I should rephrase my statement that his bat is trash.

Lot of strikeouts so far this season. But again, he's starting to trend in the right direction.

 

[Ulysees E. McGill]

I would be amazed if the NCAA would take the chance of being pulled back in front of the SC on these issues. It'll be a very bad look when they're trying to say who can't pay athletes for Nanem/Image/Likeness.

The first sanction by the NCAA, if I'm a uni, I take them straight to court.

Yep...cats out of the bag now.

 

[Orange.]

This present arrangement is the first thing that has given people a chance to compete against the corrupt schools who are exempted from the rules, while using the rules to stifle competition, and running their conference offices as puppets.

Nothing needs to be done except to let this new system play out.

 

[De La Cloobs]

They've set up an avenue to report questionable situations to their review office, which could lead to punishments, but more importantly I'm hoping we and others report in the handful and they understand how rampant it is before 2023.

In the meantime, hopefully it is a deterrent. We'll see.

So no change by the start of this season? That's gonna blow

 

[SugarCC]

Worst case for us is the NCAA tries to declare Nico's contract and all other deals Spyre has signed invalid.

Good luck with that...will never happen. Nico and his family would sue them into oblivion, as would the businesses setting up the endorsements, appearances, social media campaigns, etc.

Wouldn't you think? I'm not a lawyer; but, it's what I would do.

 

[Enki_Amenra]

 

[Orange.]

I think at the least they are trying to sow fear, uncertainty, and doubt in an attempt to stop our comeback. They are terrified of a level playing field.

 

[tnhunter 10]

3 run HR from Mike Honcho. 3-0 Vols bottom 1st.

 

[RiseToTheTop]

Honchooooo Shake n Bake

 

[Orange_Crush]

Here we go

Basically, per the article, a group of universities (probably the NIL-poor ones) have put together a list of clarifications that would hamstring current NIL activity and deem directives and collectives as "boosters", thus make it where they would be breaking current NCAA rules by operating. They will give the proposal to the NCAA to ratify and clamp down.

The same NCAA that was basically told by the SC not to come back in front of them. The same one that refused to weigh in on the same thing last year.

The NCAA can deem directives and collectives as "boosters" and get in the athlete's pockets, and thus risk lawsuits and SC appearances again (while fighting individual state laws). Or they can abstain. It's yet to be seen what they'll decide.

Reads like the NIL losers are fighting a media war to put the genie back in the bottle, and I'm not sure we've seen enough resolve from the NCAA to try.

 

[Orange.]

So no change by the start of this season? That's gonna blow

It's another way the cronies are rigging outcomes.

 

[Orange_Crush]

Good luck with that...will never happen. Nico and his family would sue them into oblivion, as would the businesses setting up the endorsements, appearances, social media campaigns, etc.

Wouldn't you think? I'm not a lawyer; but, it's what I would do.

NCAA can't afford more court appearances per getting into athlete bank accounts. And that isn't even mentioning they'll have to fight roughly 30 state legislatures who've passed law on the subject.

 

[engineerVOL]

New Volnation cinco de mayo tradition......tequila soaked pear halfs filled with mayo cheese and a cherry.

 

[Nash_Vol97]

Here we go

This should instead read as “Colleges like Alabama, Georgia and Clemson plan a crackdown on NIL collectives as these programs no longer hold a competitive advantage with payments out in the open.”

 

[Orange.]

Basically, per the article, a group of universities (probably the NIL-poor ones) have put together a list of clarifications that would hamstring current NIL activity and deem directives and collectives as "boosters", thus make it where they would be breaking current NCAA rules by operating. They will give the proposal to the NCAA to ratify and clamp down.

The same NCAA that was basically told by the SC not to come back in front of them. The same one that refused to weigh in on the same thing last year.

The NCAA can deem directives and collectives as "boosters" and get in the athlete's pockets, and thus risk lawsuits and SC appearances again (while fighting individual state laws). Or they can abstain. It's yet to be seen what they'll decide.

Reads like the NIL losers are fighting a media war to put the genie back in the bottle, and I'm not sure we've seen enough resolve from the NCAA to try.

The quasi monopoly programs (they are different in different sports) are using the little teams as their smoke screen. The primary beneficiaries of stopping this progressive new arrangement are the programs who exempt themselves from rules enforcement and use unequal enforcement to stifle competition.

 

[engineerVOL]

VOLS up 3-0 | T2 ️️️
Chase Dollander makes his return, takes over.

 

[Orange.]

This should instead read as “Colleges like Alabama, Georgia and Clemson plan a crackdown on NIL collectives as these programs no longer hold a competitive advantage with payments out in the open.”

Yes.

 

[SSVol]

Will also be interesting to see how the NCAA does against states (like TN) that altered state law to allow greater involvement in NIL by the school.

 

[Orange_Crush]

The quasi monopoly programs (they are different in different sports) are using the little teams as their smoke screen. The primary beneficiaries of stopping this progressive new arrangement are the programs who exempt themselves from rules enforcement and use unequal enforcement to stifle competition.

I suspect you are probably correct. To return to an earlier allusion, it's like the three guys hiding in an all-girls college trying to get guys banned from the all-girl college.

 

[Orange_Crush]

Will also be interesting to see how the NCAA does against states (like TN) that altered state law to allow greater involvement in NIL by the school.

I will be very surprised if the NCAA has the stomach for what's being pressed here. And it may actually be fun to watch if they are pressured to fight this battle. It may be a bloodbath for them in courts if they do.

 

[Pridedad]

I

View attachment 452528

Mayo is a subject that near and dear to my heart!

 

[engineerVOL]

Camera guy in the outfield must be getting assaulted. Making me get dizzy.

 

[Enki_Amenra]

VOLS up 3-0 | T2 ️️️
Chase Dollander makes his return, takes over.

 

[Paper_Towel]

USCw

What?