drvenner
Winning is fun
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 43,709
- Likes
- 182,182
I consider both to be outstanding prospects. If given the choice I would choose Manning.
If Arch Manning was named Jack McGill, he wouldn't be in the top 50.Why would you pick Manning though? Based off of the name? According to MaxPreps Nico averages more yards per game and has a better QBR than Manning. Manning also has 72 TD passes to 18 INT in 27 games. Nico has 50 TD passes to 2 INT in just 13 games.
You can also make the argument that Nico hasn't even come close to his potential yet because I don't think he has been playing football very long. I would assume Manning has probably been groomed to play football his entire life.
And you’re basing everything on the name Manning. I could be groomed all my life to be a lawyer by my family of lawyers. If I don’t have those ‘natural’ skills, it wouldn’t matter what my last name is. You know what, thanks, now I’m bored with you. Don’t worry, you won’t hear anymore from me. Carry on, on your own board.Manning is less likely to be a bust. He is more likely to be someone who is driven to succeed. He is likely to be someone who has the mental part of the game. Nico may be a better player but if I had a choice of who came to TN, it would be Manning.
Manning is less likely to be a bust. He is more likely to be someone who is driven to succeed. He is likely to be someone who has the mental part of the game. Nico may be a better player but if I had a choice of who came to TN, it would be Manning.