Recruiting Forum Football Talk IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cool. Take issues with his character. But not the point of the discussion.

I couldn’t care less about Kiffin and I wish many in our fan base would stop giving him free rent in their heads. He is what he is: a talented coach with a great offensive mind who has made some stupid career choices and some unscrupulous moves. He’s no longer our coach, so I don’t really care. The point was, he’s not a “loser” on the Pruitt and Dooley level. He’s actually a good coach, like him or not.
Yep, don't know why people can't understand this. He's long gone so I don't care for him anymore but there's no denying he's a good coach. Putting him in the same sentence with Precious, Botch and Tater head is. Laughable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NighthawkVol
1) "Sustainable" came from political and advertising cant and cliché, and "simplistic" is an example of whistling in the dark (and, technically, an irrelevancy because complexity is not a condition on success).

2) If it were true, then Sankey's boy and the guy with the goods on Sankey's boy would not have ordered Sankey to suppress a vote on a fake injuries rule for intraconference play at the Destin meeting. They obviously think they may need to cheat, which says a lot.

I do expect to see people try novel things, such a multiplicity of DBs. And I wouldn't be surprised to see someone attempt to imitate us in a set.

And, yo, bring me some good weather this week!

Tell me about it! The thermometer on my back porch read 109 at 6pm last evening. I hoping for a hurricane. We have been in this same weather pattern for 2 months now.
 
Glad he's not at Pitt, Bammer, or Texas. Can't truthfully say I am sad to hear there may be discontent at USC 😈. Our WR room looks better every day. 😇
This is great for those recruiting against USC. Hopefully they continue to not follow through.
 
I want to bring up a topic of discussion.

I have read many of our rivals stating that Josh Heupel’s offense is simplistic and not sustainable.

1) Where did this rhetoric come from?
2) Is any of it true?

I am concerned about our ability to either jump on top of (or stay with superior) teams and then they seem to have a better second half than us. I am hoping with another year under our belt, we will have more of the playbook to use and this will not become a concern.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VFLz15
I am concerned about our ability to either jump on top of (or stay with superior) teams and then they seem to have a better second half than us. I am hoping with another year under our belt, we will have more of the playbook to use and this will not become a concern.
A lot of that comes from lack of depth and just not having enough gas left in the 4th qtr.
 
I am concerned about our ability to either jump on top of (or stay with superior) teams and then they seem to have a better second half than us. I am hoping with another year under our belt, we will have more of the playbook to use and this will not become a concern.
We had the smallest roster in the world, to my knowledge. This class is going to begin to remedy the depth issue.
 
Mr 1980 about to go fight himself at the Waffle House. Also curious about the moniker "1980".

Shameful year to choose for one's name...
Says some loser named Devo. Bottom line. I live in Knoxville and most of you would soil yourselves if this would go offline into the real world. The internet is all a lot of you losers have.
 
is it though? according to my friend @Mozdukemod their fans are pissed at admin because their facilities stink, sans the stadium. and its incredibly difficult to get into now.
If you have a wildman billionaire throwing money around at recruits, why would he be scared to throw money at new facilities. The stadium is a different issue but if they push to build back the Hurricanes bad boy moniker, I could see it working and growing their fanbase for sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ulysees E. McGill
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top