In his fall camp kick-off presser Sunday Heupel was asked by Brent Hubbs if during the offseason Heupel and the staff during their self-scout had found any rhyme or reason why we didn’t fare so well statistically in the 2nd quarters of some of our games.
Josh thanked him for pointing that out. lol.
In the first quarter even against the big 3 last year we did pretty well winning 2 out of the 3. Overall we outscored our opponents last year in the 1st quarter in 11 of our 13 games. Only Florida and Ole Miss put more points on the board in the first quarter than we did.
In the 2nd quarter we were outscored in 7 of the 13 games. We lost the 2nd quarter to BGSU, Kentucky, Ole Miss, Pittsburgh, Purdue, Alabama, and Georgia.
We only lost 3 of the 13 3rd quarters, South Carolina, Florida, and Georgia.
We lost 5 of the 13 4th quarters, Vanderbilt, Purdue, Florida, Alabama, and Georgia.
We lost the only overtime period last year to Purdue.
Football, it is often said, is about winning one-on-one matchups. It’s also said that execution is critical. Jim Chaney throughout his time here claimed that he approaches his coordinator role as a chess player. Fans from schools all over often complain that coordinators whether offense or defense are too slow to make adjustments when things aren’t working.
One of the more common critiques of Heupel’s offense is that it is too simple and relies heavily on attacking the defense when it is not ready or properly aligned. It’s thought that the tempo challenges communication on the defensive side of the ball and allows us to take advantage of catching the defense off-guard so to speak. One analyst for On3 who has high regard for the Briles offense claims that Heupel’s version is janky. I had to look up that word. It means poor quality. I mean that’s like his opinion. jmo.
In the 3 Power 5 losses not among the big 3 SEC teams on our schedule it would seem that we lost the game in the 2nd quarter. Overall we won the 1st quarters of those games as well as marginally coming out ahead in the 3rd and 4th quarters. We got blasted by those 3 teams in the 2nd quarter, 57-13. We lost the 2nd quarter to our big 3 permanent SEC opponents by a score of 38-7.
In the 7 games we won we outscored our opponents in the 2nd quarter by a score of 89-48 so it would seem like whatever the issue may be isn’t related to all of our opponents.
In wins, we won 1Q 119-10, 2Q 89-48, 3Q 87-34, and 4Q 56-35.
In losses, we won 1Q 71-41. We lost 2Q 20-95, 3Q 27-41, and 4Q 42-71.
Josh’s answer to Brent was that the 2nd quarter was pretty poignant in some of our games. He said there was no magic potion. He said it was some of the things that we controlled in those ball games, in particular on the offensive side of the football. He talked about everything we’re doing in the weight room and our offseason program and how they’ve related everything to 4 quarters. Honestly, to an extent, it all that sounded like coach-speak to me and I would have been just as pleased if Josh told Brent that what they were doing to address the issue was none of his business. lol..
Here’s what has been said that I think answers Brent’s question. First, in the spring Alex Golesh said that our offense would continue to evolve. Second, it has been said Hooker and the other guys have a much better grasp of our offense heading into year two. Third, it has been said that we are adding option elements to our offense and in fact were practicing that in the spring.
Last year Heupel got a lot of praise for his scheme and rightly so for the results it produced compared to our recent experience on offense but apparently what we were doing last year will only take us so far depending on the quality of our opponent, both players on the field and opposing coaches. I learned from Booger McFarland not to dismiss outside critiques that I may not want to hear. His preseason claim that we would be abysmal in 2017 yielded the worst on-field performance for a Tennessee football team in the entire history of the program. At the time on VolNation McFarland was the devil incarnate. jmo.
I think most critiques from rival fans can be dismissed but if those critiques are coming from someone not wedded to a fanbase I think they’re worth looking into. After I had posted a number of times about our defense and expectations for the coming year on that side of the ball one forum regular noted that no one talks about the offense.
This is my thinking on the offense. Heupel and Golesh are evolving the offense in order to address the issues we faced last year against some of the better teams on our schedule. I think they don’t want too many specifics of that ongoing evolution getting out but they’ve told us that they know we need to make some adjustments and they’ve let us know as much as they can that they have a plan. jmo.
I think across our program deficiencies identified last year by the staff and players are being addressed. We have more talent, more experience and development, a better grasp of our schemes, and have added wrinkles to our schemes to throw at some of the better teams on our schedule which is why I do not think it is pie in the sky wishful thinking that our performance this year has the potential to shock the world. jmo.