UTSuave’
MissYaSoda 🥺🫶🏽
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2014
- Messages
- 17,525
- Likes
- 61,520
If I'm being super critical, here's my biggest complaint with this season and how it unfolded. Earlier in the year I was harping on this too. Only 6 players who averaged more than 15 minutes per game, and Pons hit 12.5...so that's bloated since he was starting for a few games.
View attachment 198252
Duke a team who is not very deep had 7 guys over 15mpg and an 8th guy who was near 15mpg with 13.8. Maybe those 8-14 guys didn't "earn" the time, but I'm a big believer that the season should be where you really find out who can play cause practice isn't always a great indicator (Peterman vs Dobbs for example one always looked great in practice and the other didn't but when it's game time the separation of talent was different).
yeah, and i think fulky is probably getting the max minutes he should get. i do think we could rest Grant and Admiral more during games and get Walker out there....he definitley needs to develop. Johnson looks like he could really be something, but he needs to play more....i'm glad he's seen the court more of late, but i don't know how much of a factor he can really be at this point.Good post. I would've loved to see more of Jalen, Fulky, and Walker through the regular season.
Their development might have been greatly expedited.
Does some of that boil down to those guys in the top 6 not closing out games? Perhaps.
But with more rest, maybe that wouldn't have been a problem.
Chicken or the egg?
big off season for all those guys coming up.Yep. At the beginning of the season, we knew that how far this team could go depended on how much production we could get from the bench. We need Pons, Fulkerson, Walker and Johnson to play quality minutes. Bowden is a solid sixth man and Fulk has come along, but Walker and Johnson haven't developed like we hoped. It looked like Pons would take the next step, but that stalled. Maybe some of them will seize the opportunity and break out at the NCAAT.
you're welcome.I don’t know about the rest of you, but I sure am grateful for the posters here that breakdown the egregious flaws in our team that allowed the losses to 1, 2, 3 and 5 seeds to happen.
I just thought that sometimes you just get beat by a good team - so glad my eyes have been opened to the truth.
I don't know..I don't want to call them failures, so I'm not, but using the football teams fortunes to make a point here...That's true if you judge the season based on a conference championship. I don't, there has been so many accomplishments this year, so many great times. I agree, the championships, SEC, National was their goal but it won't be a failure if they don't achieve either, at least in my mind.
I don’t know about the rest of you, but I sure am grateful for the posters here that breakdown the egregious flaws in our team that allowed the losses to a No. 1 team and the 2, 3 and 5 seeds to happen.
I just thought that sometimes you just get beat by a good team - so glad my eyes have been opened to the truth.
I think that close loss to AU on their court caused more harm than if AU had beaten them badly in that game...you know what I mean?Men's and women's BB have some of the same issues-- inconsistent effort, a sporadic lack of intensity and the occasional no-show from key players. Some days, both teams feel like they can come out, give half-effort and still win-- and a less-talented opponent proves them wrong. The men's team has been fortunate to salvage some near-losses when that happens; the women's team generally has not.
That's what the players and coaches say. Barnes, GW and AD have been candid about it. If it continues to happen, they'll continue to have tough losses. But it doesn't have to happen and they know how to fix it. Learn from yesterday and flush it.
agreed. i think for me, obviously as a fan, i'm disappointed...but i acutally feel worse for the players, cause i know that "unfinished business" was part of the deal going in to this year, with everyone coming back.That's true if you judge the season based on a conference championship. I don't, there has been so many accomplishments this year, so many great times. I agree, the championships, SEC, National was their goal but it won't be a failure if they don't achieve either, at least in my mind.
Obviously I'm just a fan, and it's easy to armchair coach. But I don't think there is enough separation of talent between Turner/Bowden/Kyle that they dominate that many more minutes than Fulkerson/Walker/Pons/Jalen.
We have 3 elite players imo, guys who can play with any team and be starters anywhere in the country. Grant/Bone/Admiral then next 3 guys are very solid and good players, but the next 3-4 guys aren't that far off the 2nd group and I think you can find the fire by putting them in game time situations.
How can a guy like Jalen or Walker learn to play through foul trouble or poor shooting nights when they get pulled so soon? There was times (TTU etc.) when you could just let these guys "figure it out" a bit on the court, and nothing they do in practice will ever give them that same sort of opportunity as if they were in a game and facing opponents who are going as hard as they can to take it to you.
What will be The Lady Vols fate this evening? I know women's basketball isn't the most popular in this thread but it's still hard to fathom watching the selection show to see if The Lady Vols make it in or not.
I agree that Barnes needed to get more playing time for Fulkerson, Pons, Walker, and Johnson. However, I don’t agree that Bowden, Turner, and Alexander are about even with them. Those last 3 players have won games for us with individual efforts. They have to be playing in crunch time.
Missouri State who is coached by former Lady Vol Kellie Jolly Harper stole a bid yesterday by defeating Drake in their conference tournament final.I think they get in. Apparently the women’s committee releases a “Debatable Eight,” which reveal the last 4 in and the first 4 out. The Lady Vols were one of the teams. I saw commentary on ESPN saying the Lady Vols should be in based on the comparable teams.
Aka. they're the first women's basketball Blueblood so they need to be in the tournamentI think they get in. Apparently the women’s committee releases a “Debatable Eight,” which reveal the last 4 in and the first 4 out. The Lady Vols were one of the teams. I saw commentary on ESPN saying the Lady Vols should be in based on the comparable teams.