Orange_Crush
Resident windbag genius
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2004
- Messages
- 37,966
- Likes
- 75,591
I am looking at it from the perspective of what's been released, and what many people are responding to. I said that clearly in my post, and even made it blatant with the "this may not even be what happened" comment. And per the "from the victim's perspective" I spoke to this:Sounds to me like you are only looking at it from the victims point of view. While dismissing the facts. There is a difference in “perception” of events from both sides. There is also a lot of facts missing because McCullough was smart and didn’t talk to the police.
Lol. You saying we wish he will play so we are hoping it gets dropped is a fallacy, I think he sucks at Safety so I don’t care if he plays or not. But, looking at it from a reasonable perspective of current facts. The intoxicated individual is not in the winners seat. It’s actually quite the opposite from a legal perspective. A lawyer will tear his actions and statements apart.
If he apologized and left, then no. It's not.
Geez Us people. It's an apartment complex. This stupid **** happens all the time. I got drunk when I was 19 and walked into the wrong apartment at 1 am. The person inside helped me find my way to the right apartment and asked my friends to take care of me since I was obviously not in a state to take care of myself.
My daughters were raised to look for people like that to have in their lives.
I'm thinking of this from a legal and common decency perspective. If the guy accidentally walked into the wrong apartment, apologized, and was followed out... Then he is the victim. Not the girl.
You say "But, looking at it from a reasonable perspective of current facts."... And that I'm "While dismissing the facts."
Then you defend the assault as thoug the drunk moron was a rapist that burst into the apartment with a machete.
It's. A. Freaking. Apartment. Complex.
Stuff like this happens.