You keep saying this. That's your problem, you think your the only one who sees and knows things. We saw it!!, yes, Nebraska was roided all the way up...you're just hung up on only them, though, because they were the poster child for it, AND because no one dominated the way they did; but, it was going on full tilt at other places, as well.
Outside of Nebraska, Miami and FSU ran rough shot in the 80s and 90s. How many titles would FSU had won, if not for...Miami. Also, yes, 95 Nebraska bulldozed everyone; but, 94, they beat who for the National Title?? Miami...and, they only beat them by a touchdown. No bulldozing, because Miami was just as big, just as fast, just as juiced.
In 2012, multiple articles were written about an investigation the AP did on steroid use at the college level. They found that it was RAMPANT. That's an investigation that took part in the 2000s...what do you think was happening in the 80s and 90s??
Quoting...
Controversy arose in 2005, when former
Brigham Young University player
Jason Scukanec, although never admitting to using steroids himself, stated that steroids were used in many notable
Division I programs.
[5]
Scukanec, who is the co-host of a
sports talk radio show "Primetime With Isaac and Big Suke" on KFXX-AM (AM 1080 "The Fan") in Portland, Oregon, made these statements:
Over the course of my five years at BYU, I have concrete proof of 13 to 15 guys (using steroids), and I would suspect five others...And BYU is more temperate than most programs. Being around NFL and NFL Europe players, they would tell me stuff that blew my mind. I know other schools are worse. I would bet my house you could find at least five guys on every Division I team in the country (using steroids)
As I said, Nebraska was the poster child for it, with good reason; but, do you, seriously, believe they were the only ones doing it, team wide? Are you seriously, not only thinking that, but saying it...out loud?