unioncityvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2013
- Messages
- 6,600
- Likes
- 3,111
Im open to reconsider. Someone convince me why Mullen would be more than a solid hire (which I think it would be). Convince me with coaching staff, stories, philopsophy, etc. why Mullen is a sexy, championship-level hire.
Agreed. Worthless and the same as a verbal agreement which is non binding.
Cliffs notes version:
As an assistant:
Position coach for #1 overall draft pick. OC and position coach for heisman trophy winner. OC for two national title teams.
As a head coach:
Has made the worst job in the toughest division of the hardest conference in the country an above average to good program. A program that had only 13 bowl appearances in its history prior to him, he has made 7 in a row and this season will be 8. Has the reputation of maximizing and developing talent and finding good recruits even though all the schools around him have more to offer.
Cliffs notes version:
As an assistant:
Position coach for #1 overall draft pick. OC and position coach for heisman trophy winner. OC for two national title teams.
As a head coach:
Has made the worst job in the toughest division of the hardest conference in the country an above average to good program. A program that had only 13 bowl appearances in its history prior to him, he has made 7 in a row and this season will be 8. Has the reputation of maximizing and developing talent and finding good recruits even though all the schools around him have more to offer.
Agreed. Worthless and the same as a verbal agreement which is non binding.
Im open to reconsider. Someone convince me why Mullen would be more than a solid hire (which I think it would be). Convince me with coaching staff, stories, philopsophy, etc. why Mullen is a sexy, championship-level hire.
Specifically, I don't recall many of them. But practically, you wouldn't want to enforce it if the guy decides he doesn't want to be at your school.
Im open to reconsider. Someone convince me why Mullen would be more than a solid hire (which I think it would be). Convince me with coaching staff, stories, philopsophy, etc. why Mullen is a sexy, championship-level hire.
-MSU is Vandy West, if his success there translates to a bigger program as well as Franklin's has, we will all be happy.
-He has had MSU playing their best ball since the 1940's, including spending some time at #1 in the country and finishing 2nd in the SEC behind Bama.
-He was a national and SEC championship winning OC under Urban Meyer
-He coached and developed three of the five QB's in SEC history to reach 3,000 yards passing and 1,000 yards rushing. That, and Dak Prescott's recent NFL success, could prove to be key in keeping Dormady, Guarantano, McBride, Martinez, and Penix in the fold. Not to mention QB recruiting in the future.
-He has great player development. Has produced only one less NFL draft pick during in his nine years at MSU than UT has over the same timeframe. This is despite having significantly lower rates recruiting classes over that period.
-He has shown good judgement in hiring staff, specifically Geoff Collins and Manny Diaz at DC. It just seems he hasn't been able to pony up the cash to keep them when bigger programs have called, this won't be a problem at UT.
If the Gruden deal falls through, and Kelly, Peterson, and Patterson aren't options, Mullen is the next best possible hire.