Catbone
Hit me baby one more time
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2010
- Messages
- 67,188
- Likes
- 65,030
I dont know why I even bothered arguing with people who cant see we need a proven winner this time around. And after Gruden is hired next week you low expectation having mfers are going to need to learn how to up your standards.
Ron, who is arguing that we don't need a proven winner?
This is an old and tired argument. The players are our there working their asses off, watching their bosses and companies rake in millions that most of them will never see. They at the very least deserve the right to change employers without penalty and they don't even have that.
I dont know why I even bothered arguing with people who cant see we need a proven winner this time around. And after Gruden is hired next week you low expectation having mfers are going to need to learn how to up your standards.
I know whats going on. My question is not an argument. If the Ps, and Grude say no , cause those are no brainers then who do you go to next?
Ask Arkansas how that worked out for them.
We are talking to coaches who have won a lot games but its not good enough. I guarantee A large group of Fans wouldve been livid if we hired Mark Richt right after Georgia fires him.
Ask Arkansas how that worked out for them.
We are talking to coaches who have won a lot games but its not good enough. I guarantee A large group of Fans wouldve been livid if we hired Mark Richt right after Georgia fires him.
I think people are confusing "proven big-time winner" with a coach who turns out to be a very good hire. The examples mentioned: Texas, LSU, USC...none of them hired "proven big-time winners". The fact they may have hired their first choice is irrelevant.
And when UW hired Petersen he was not "proven big-time winner". He may have been an up-and-comer, like Frost or Campbell maybe today. And he has proven to be a very good hire. But that's not the same as a "proven big time winner".
There are very few "proven big-time winners" out there now and it'll be tough to hire one of them.
Ron can speak for himself, but I suspect that his point it that there are a number of posters here who would be content with any one of several named coaches who don't exactly make you want to line up for season tickets. I agree with him, for the most part.
I think Gruden is it, and I think we got him. Failing that, I would make a run at Peterson, Patterson, Campbell, and Frost, in that order. One might make the argument that Campbell and Frost are not "proven winners", and maybe so. But they are in the process of proving it, and I would be fine with them proving it here.
No other name that I have heard or can recall right now really would impress me, including Mullen, Norvell, etc.
Go Vols.