Vol464
New location
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2012
- Messages
- 6,167
- Likes
- 7,976
Volatil solid post- sorry I must have missed it, which players were going to commit and didn't? This is a puzzling recruiting cycle for sure. One could argue we had a better year last year than Georgia especially with our finish, and even with a new unproven head coach, their recruiting is on fire. We just seem to be puttering along.
No, it could not have been settled a year ago. That's not how the legal system works. UT will settle this lawsuit when the insurance carriers decide to settle and for the amount they deem appropriate. Attorneys won't even float serious numbers until after discovery.
UT's not letting CBJ go over a money grab that has nothing to do with criminal behavior and has even less to do with Team 120. Some meritless civil suit won't negatively affect recruiting half as much as the fallout from continuing to lose to our rivals or failing to win the SECE. Win and the recruits will come.
I don't think he's going to UNC.
He's blowing up with offers now. Clemson this past week.
I like the kid but I have had some question if he's an SEC player. He has some head scratching games then completely dominates in others. For instance, I told a good friend of mine about my concerns prior to the playoff game against Bradley Central. Bonds took over the game. 2 INTS and made every tackle. My friend, from Cleveland, said I'm the worst evaluator of talent he's ever seen.
Ok so maybe not a year ago, but LWS mentioned that Jones was frustrated because UT was presented with the chance to settle last fall but chose not to. The dude knows his stuff. And based on what he says, some of the negative pub could have been avoided.
And I don't think Jones should nor would get fired over any of this but it absolutely opens the door for opposing coaches to creatively speculate about it all they want to prospects and their families. In that respect, I guarantee it affects recruiting.
I would really like to know what LWS is saying about trying to settle last fall. The only way that was even possible was if the plaintiffs' attorneys sent a demand letter and outlined the nature of their potential suit. Otherwise, no one knew that the suit was coming.
Recruiting is always a crapshoot but this year has been exhausting.
Kids hate us then love us after Shoop.
Kids are going to commit then don't.
I can't remember a more confusing year in recruiting. Thankfully it's really early and we do have an incredible recruiter in Butch.
Not losing sleep by any means but I have to say this is puzzling.
We have to win big this year. Winning cures everything.
Ok so maybe not a year ago, but LWS mentioned that Jones was frustrated because UT was presented with the chance to settle last fall but chose not to. The dude knows his stuff. And based on what he says, some of the negative pub could have been avoided.
And I don't think Jones should nor would get fired over any of this but it absolutely opens the door for opposing coaches to creatively speculate about it all they want to prospects and their families. In that respect, I guarantee it affects recruiting.
The suit was filed in February 2016. As VolGee notes, the only way to resolve the matter prior to filing was to open negotiations based on a demand letter. No public university is going to do that-- and no liability carrier is going to allow it. Not in a case like this. It's frustrating for everyone, but Butch is a smart guy and he understands that it's a process.
Other schools have always recruited against UT, and now that we're resuming relevancy, negative recruiting is escalating. Failure to close big games, questionable in-game coaching, embarrassing losing streaks to rivals, not getting players in the NFL, etc. etc. -- IMO, these claims are more relevant to recruits than a Title IX lawsuit about whether TUAPA ensures compliance with federal law. But who knows-- maybe recruits really care about UT's administrative procedure.
'14 class is still strong. I get what you're saying, but that class was bound to have high attrition.Too early to pass judgment on 2016.
If it pans out the way 2015 has, where literally 90%+ of the class looks to be anywhere from superstars to solid contributors, then we will be in great shape moving forward.
But if it turns out like 2014, which was highly rated but suffered from a lot of attrition and busts, we will be in trouble unless Butch and co. can pull in a loaded 2017 class. You can't have two down years in recruiting or even two "good but not great" years in a row in the SEC and not have it severely affect on the field performance.
'14 class is still strong. I get what you're saying, but that class was bound to have high attrition.