Big Gucci Sosa
Sniper Gang.
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2015
- Messages
- 33,976
- Likes
- 87,201
Folks, here is the URL for our Facebook Live address. Don't have to be Facebook members to watch. But there is an important announcement for UT athletics coming in an hour exclusive to this Facebook Live site, and we want to bring it to you all first.
Tennessee Volunteers on 247Sports | Facebook
Scheduled to start around 2:30 p.m. ET.
I have him on ignore but he is making pretty good points.
Phelps does have an inflated medal count. Swimming has an entry barrier more so than running.
Not sure how anyone can argue against those two things.
He plays a sport with a high barrier of entry and has an inflated medal count because swimming award medals for doing the same thing in different ways.
Most people in the world don't have access to swimming pools. As a result, most countries don't have serious swimming programs. Swimming is restricted to very rich countries. So we really have no idea how great Phelps is because the pool of competitors he goes against is limited. Unlike Bolt who goes against everyone because running has almost no barrier to entry. Everyone in the world regardless of wealth can run.
And then about the medal count. Swimming has all these weird derivations of doing the same thing. Butterfly, breaststroke, backstroke, etc. You have freestyle relays, medley relays, butterfly relays, etc. Basically all these different derivations of the same thing that inflate a medal count.
In track its the 100m, 200m, 400m, etc. Usain Bolt didn't have the liberty to winning medals in the 100m run backwards or the 200m skipping.
IMO there is no comparison between Bolt and Phelps as athletes. Bolt is significantly more impressive.
Almost every country has a swim team. Most continents have swimming championships. There are a number of third world countries that compete.
I agree there is no comparison--Phelps is much, much more dominant than Bolt.
Bolt is a one-trick pony. He's the best sprinter of all time. But it's not clear that he's the best runner of all time, let alone best athlete. He has won 3 straight Olympic titles in the 100m. Very impressive, and he may do it in the 200m too. But it's not that hard to imagine another track athlete duplicating that feat (whether in that event or another).
What Phelps has done is unfathomable. Seriously. You can object about multiple different strokes or whatever, but you can't ignore the fact that no swimmer has been able to even come close at all to what Phelps has been able to do.
You say Bolt could win all these other races if they existed... but why hasn't he even tried to win the 110m hurdles? What about the 400m? If he's truly the greatest runner--and even athlete--of all time, then why won't he run anything other than the same two races?
Swimming might have a little higher barrier to entry, but not that much. There's water all over the world. It's not that different than running, to be honest.
Really?
Cause all I see is the same 7 or 8 countries at every event. A bunch of European countries, the US, Australia, China, and Japan.
And almost always there are no African or South American countries competing (except for host nation Brazil this year).
Really?
Cause all I see is the same 7 or 8 countries at every event. A bunch of European countries, the US, Australia, China, and Japan.
And almost always there are no African or South American countries competing (except for host nation Brazil this year).
What Bolt does is more difficult and prestigious.
He has the whole of humanity competiting against him. From the time we were little kids, everyone raced. And everyone wanted to be the fastest. Compare that to swimming where most people on earth don't even know how to swim.
Being the fastest sprinter on earth will always be more impressive than anything related to swimming.
Sorry man but they're not even in the same hemisphere of importance.
But Phelps has completely dominated his sport for the last 15 years. He has been faster than anybody in history, more versatile than anybody in history, and done it for longer than anybody in history. And all the while he has been competing in--and winning--as many as 8 events at a single meet while most of his competitors have been swimming just a few. It's utterly remarkable.
Really?
Cause all I see is the same 7 or 8 countries at every event. A bunch of European countries, the US, Australia, China, and Japan.
And almost always there are no African or South American countries competing (except for host nation Brazil this year).
Except there are 173 countries competing in 32 swimming events and 200 countries in 47 track events.
What you are suffering from, beyond a crippling sense of self importance, is called confirmation bias.