Maxwell
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2012
- Messages
- 1,805
- Likes
- 754
So it is "histrionics" to point out that UT is now reduced to stealing recruits from WKU and hoping that Bama doesn't want a kid?
I've been watching this a very long time. There are no histrionics... but there is "history". I've seen this in UT recruiting before. UT is getting 3* caliber players, 4* players with academic questions, and then a few really solid recruits.
You can engage in histrionics all you like... but this type of recruiting is not how you compete with UF, UGA, Bama, LSU, Auburn, et al.
The truth really annoys folks who would rather ignore unpleasant things....
I am a UT fan. I am NOT yet a Jones fan because I am unimpressed with the results he's produced though he deserves credit for raising the talent level of the roster. The problem is that recruiting is now falling off... and we have no evidence that he can "coach'em up" and compete in the SEC.
It's all subjective though. Most people break all kinds of laws every day. And different laws serve different purposes. Some keep society safe (drunk driving laws, murder laws, etc), some make sure government can function properly (tax laws and the like), and some are antiquated attempts at legislating morality (weed laws).
Do you always drive the speed limit? Doubt it.
Did you never drink alcohol before you were 21? Doubt it.
Jaywalking? People do it all the time.
It's just not black and white. Many laws lose meaning when society collectively decides they're not useful. That's happened with weed laws to a certain extent in large segments of the country.
So it is "histrionics" to point out that UT is now reduced to stealing recruits from WKU and hoping that Bama doesn't want a kid?
Yes, it is hystrionics. Moreover, it is not true. To imply, as you did, that we never win a recruiting battle is simply not true. To imply, as you did, that we only get players no D1 program wants is not true. I imagine you know that. I imagine acknowledging that twarts your rant before it starts. So I understand why you don't acknowledge it.
To further make this point...Rank by offer has us 8th best class and 15 based on average player. Granted, we all wish we were higher but still getting quality.
if we were at 9-4 with top 15 classes id be overjoyed. Trouble is, realistically i dont forsee this group coaching up three, or four star players to suit. I do think Shoop will py dividends this year.
If this was the MAC itd be different, it isnt.
This is just dodging the argument and not addressing it though.Not sure how any of this proves your point. It's pretty simple- if you believe in it so much, you move to those states where legislatures have legalized it. They would truly be representing your stance on the issue.
I may not agree with the speed limit on a street, but the moral thing to do is follow the speed. I may have had some alcohol before 21, but it doesn't mean it was right. It wasn't the law abiding, moral thing to do. That doesn't change my argument one bit.
This is just an old argument. If states want to vote in legislators who are willing to change it, then good for them. But for the time being, civilized countries have laws to follow. Otherwise, they would be anything but civil. Let's move on.
Either you missed my point, or you're (ironically) building your own straw man.
The point I was making was that something being illegal doesn't make it immoral.
I got the point just fine. I just think it's in very poor taste to compare the clearly immoral persecution of a people due to skin color to the government's arbitrary decision that weed is bad...something the FDA does every day.